tft display driver circuit free sample

The ST7789 TFT module contains a display controller with the same name: ST7789. It’s a color display that uses SPI interface protocol and requires 3, 4 or 5 control pins, it’s low cost and easy to use. This display is an IPS display, it comes in different sizes (1.3″, 1.54″ …) but all of them should have the same resolution of 240×240 pixel, this means it has 57600 pixels. This module works with 3.3V only and it doesn’t support 5V (not 5V tolerant).

The ST7789 display module shown in project circuit diagram has 7 pins: (from right to left): GND (ground), VCC, SCL (serial clock), SDA (serial data), RES (reset), DC (or D/C: data/command) and BLK (back light).

As mentioned above, the ST7789 TFT display controller works with 3.3V only (power supply and control lines). The display module is supplied with 3.3V (between VCC and GND) which comes from the Arduino board.

To connect the Arduino to the display module, I used voltage divider for each line which means there are 4 voltage dividers. Each voltage divider consists of 2.2k and 3.3k resistors, this drops the 5V into 3V which is sufficient.

The first library is a driver for the ST7789 TFT display which can be installed from Arduino IDE library manager (Sketch —> Include Library —> Manage Libraries …, in the search box write “st7789” and install the one from Adafruit).

In this Arduino touch screen tutorial we will learn how to use TFT LCD Touch Screen with Arduino. You can watch the following video or read the written tutorial below.

As an example I am using a 3.2” TFT Touch Screen in a combination with a TFT LCD Arduino Mega Shield. We need a shield because the TFT Touch screen works at 3.3V and the Arduino Mega outputs are 5 V. For the first example I have the HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor, then for the second example an RGB LED with three resistors and a push button for the game example. Also I had to make a custom made pin header like this, by soldering pin headers and bend on of them so I could insert them in between the Arduino Board and the TFT Shield.

Here’s the circuit schematic. We will use the GND pin, the digital pins from 8 to 13, as well as the pin number 14. As the 5V pins are already used by the TFT Screen I will use the pin number 13 as VCC, by setting it right away high in the setup section of code.

I will use the UTFT and URTouch libraries made by Henning Karlsen. Here I would like to say thanks to him for the incredible work he has done. The libraries enable really easy use of the TFT Screens, and they work with many different TFT screens sizes, shields and controllers. You can download these libraries from his website, RinkyDinkElectronics.com and also find a lot of demo examples and detailed documentation of how to use them.

After we include the libraries we need to create UTFT and URTouch objects. The parameters of these objects depends on the model of the TFT Screen and Shield and these details can be also found in the documentation of the libraries.

So now I will explain how we can make the home screen of the program. With the setBackColor() function we need to set the background color of the text, black one in our case. Then we need to set the color to white, set the big font and using the print() function, we will print the string “Arduino TFT Tutorial” at the center of the screen and 10 pixels  down the Y – Axis of the screen. Next we will set the color to red and draw the red line below the text. After that we need to set the color back to white, and print the two other strings, “by HowToMechatronics.com” using the small font and “Select Example” using the big font.

Since the reference voltages are connected to all channels, many DACs may use the same reference voltage. The more DACs there are connected to a single reference voltage, the larger the required C-DAC settling time. This study simulates the settling time for different numbers of connected DACs using a 0.35-μm 5-V CMOS model. Figure 11 shows the simulated results where the settling time is measured at 99.9% of its final voltage for a full swing (0.266 V ~ 4.75 V). The settling time is 5.2 μs when 200 DACs are connected to a single reference voltage. Although a column driver IC contains several hundreds or even up to a thousand DACs, these DACs are distributed to 256 (28) reference voltages. This means that not all the DACs are connected to a single reference voltage. A typical UXGA (1600×1200) display has a pixel clock frequency of 162 MHz and a horizontal scanning time of 9.877 μs [4]. Hence, the proposed column driver is suitable for UXGA displays.

Due to the limited silicon area, the proposed LCD column driver has only four channels. The 10-bit LCD column driver with R-DAC and C-DAC was fabricated using a 0.35-μm 5-V CMOS technology. Table I shows the device sizes used in the proposed column driver, where Rtop, Rmid, Rbot, and Ri are designated in Figure 7. Figure 12 is a photograph of the die. Except for the resistor string of the R-DAC, the die area is 0.2×1.26 mm2 for four channels. Each RGB digital input code is 10-bits wide.

The Differential Nonlinearity (DNL) and Integral Nonlinearity (INL) are typically measured for a DAC. However, it is difficult to determine these two specifications for a nonlinear DAC. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed circuit, the nonlinear gamma voltages are not applied to the R-string and the resistor values of the resistor string are made equal. Since an LCD panel needs several column drivers, the uniformity of different drivers is very important. Figure 13 shows the measured transfer curves of a DAC for eight off-chip column drivers. To show the deviation between different chips, Figure 14 provides an

enlarged view of the transfer curves, where the maximum deviation is 3.5 mV from the mean. This deviation is mainly due to process variations. The approach in this study uses no error correction. Hence, the deviation can be reduced by applying an offset canceling technique to the buffer amplifier. Figures 15(a) and (b) show the DNL values for positive and negative polarities, respectively. Figures 16(a) and (b) show the INL values for positive and negative polarities, respectively. The combination of R-DACs and C-DACs creates two groups of DNL values. The maximum DNL and INL values are 3.83 and 3.84 LSB, respectively. This study uses a 1-LSB voltage of 2.44mV to calculate the INL and DNL values. The linearity, however, is less important than the deviations between off-chip drivers for LCD drivers [2].

Figure 17 shows the measured output waveforms of two neighboring channels under dot inversion for the RGB digital inputs of ‘1111111111.’ Here, the voltage levels for negative and positive polarities are 0.266 V and 4.75 V, respectively. A load resistor of 5 kΩ and a capacitor of 90 pF were used. Figure 18 shows a similar waveform for ‘0000000000’ inputs, where the corresponding voltage levels for negative and positive polarities are 2.425 V and 2.598 V, respectively. These two figures show that the settling time is within 3 μs, which is smaller than that of previously published work [2] and standard UXGA displays [5]. Table II summarizes the performance of the proposed column driver IC. The average area per channel is 0.063 mm2, which is smaller than the reported areas of fully R-DAC-based column drivers [5, 8]. These experimental results show that the proposed column driver is suitable for UXGA LCD-TV applications.

FocusLCDs.com sent me a free sample of a 4x3” TFT LCD (P/N: E43RG34827LW2M300-R) to try out. This is a color active matrix TFT (Thin Film Transistor) LCD (liquid crystal display) that uses amorphous silicon TFT as a switching device. This model is composed of a Transmissive type TFT-LCD Panel, driver circuit, backlight unit. The resolution of a 4.3” TFT-LCD contains 480x272 pixels, and can display up to 16.7M colors.

For this project, you would need the RA8875 driver board (available at AdaFruit for US$35) to interface the TFT display to the Arduino. It comes with a header which you can solder on as needed.

Display technology has moved forward at light speed. For years, even sophisticated equipment made do with numeric and alphanumeric display technology, buttons, and LEDs.

With mass production, manufacturing refinements, and competition, thin film transistor (TFT) displays have drastically dropped in price while dramatically improving in performance. They are the de facto standard to the point where it is not only expected, it is demanded that any modern user interface be full color, brightly backlit, touch sensitive, and have high video speeds and a good viewing angle.

While simple low-cost 8-bit microcontrollers could easily handle the multiplexed 7- and 14-segment LED and alphanumeric LCD displays, the memory, processor speeds, and peripheral resources needed to drive a TFT are more than most modest microcontrollers can handle. As a result, dedicated controller chips, embedded modules, or faster, denser, and more streamlined processor architectures are needed.

This article looks at the factors that make a good MCU-to-TFT interface. This includes memory depths and architectures, paging, data transfer, signaling levels, interfaces, and on-chip peripherals to look for when selecting a microcontroller for a TFT application. It examines the TFT technology and present day product offerings, which your designs will need to drive. It also looks at some microcontrollers that provide native support for color TFT displays, looking at their techniques, features, trade-offs, and limitations. All displays, microcontrollers, drivers, inverters, and development tools mentioned in this article are available from Digi-Key Corporation.

TFT displays are a type of liquid crystal display in which the transistor controlling the pixel’s crystal is etched into a layer of amorphous silicon deposited on the glass (see Figure 1). As in an IC process, very small transistors are geometrically formed. The small size of the transistor means it will not significantly attenuate the light passing through.

The advantage of TFTs is that they are fast enough for video, provide a large and smooth color palette, and are pixel addressable through an electronic two-dimensional control matrix (see Figure 2). Most low-cost displays use an amorphous silicon crystal layer deposited onto the glass through a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition.

Figure 2: Electronically, a stable VCOM reference is used throughout the display, and the gamma corrected drive voltage passes through each transistor.

Many versions of TFT technologies have led us to the modern displays. Early complaints like poor viewing angles, poor contrast, and poor backlighting have been addressed. Better light sources, diffusers, and polarizers make many displays very vivid, some even claiming to be daylight readable. Modern day techniques like in-plane switching improve viewing angles by making the crystals move in a parallel direction to the display plane instead of vertically. Better speeds and contrasts of modern display make them high performance for a fairly low cost.

Since TFTs are not emissive devices, they require backlighting. The most commonly deployed backlight technology is cold cathode florescent lighting (CCFL). These devices were designed, chosen, and used because they are very efficient and have very long lives. Typically, a CCFL bulb is rated as having in the ball park of a 50,000 hour ‘half-life. ’ This means that after 50,000 hours, it still works, but with half the intensity when it was new.

Modern displays, especially the smaller ones, have transitioned to white LED-based backlights. These are easier to manufacture, do not require the high voltage inverter which CCFL bulbs need, and are approaching a lower cost point compared to CCFL technology. Both CCFL and LED technologies will use diffuser layers inside the stackup to evenly distribute light. LED-based backlights may actually be side lights and use a lightpipe structure to distribute the light.

Transflective technology is steadily improving and is available in some TFT displays. This is where both a backlight and ambient external light are used to make the display visible. Sunlight may make it viewable, but generally speaking the transflective displays are less transmissive. This means that the backlight will have to be brighter (and require more power) to be on par with a purely transmissive display that requires a backlight all the time.

With TFT and most color display technologies, an individual pixel contains a red, a green, and a blue picture element (pel). The relative intensity of each color will determine the resulting blended color.

Some displays will use dithering and alternating pixel colors to achieve a better blend of intermediate colors. Higher frame rates are also used since the persistence effect of phosphor-based displays does not carry over to LCDs. Determine the quality and smoothness of the display you will use. Not every frame rate control technique yields flicker- and jitter-free performance, especially at some resolutions. If you notice it, so will your customers and end users of your design.

The memory required to map the display image is key. While some micros will contain enough memory to hold a single page of display data (and not much else), you can see that a lot of memory is required for even a modest ¼ VGA display. This is more than what a typical microcontroller can house (see Table 1). As a result, an external bus interface to external RAM (SRAM, DRAM, or SDRAM) will be needed, especially if paging will be used.

Table 1: The memory required to map to a display is proportional to three times the square of the resolution because of the three color elements of each pixel.

Paging will allow better display quality since one page can be displayed while the next is being built in the background, then made live. This eliminates ghosting and image flicker when graphics are changing rapidly in effects like scrolling, moving sprites (graphical objects), color shade blending (for overlapping graphics as they move), etc.

A key feature when selecting a microcontroller for TFT interfacing is the DMA support. Multi-channel, flexible DMA will make a world of difference, especially when it comes to moving data between pages, character generator and rendering tables, animations and video. Along these lines, a preprogrammed and autonomous DMA functionality will allow you to refresh a display while the core microcontroller goes to sleep. This is a key power-reducing feature that can make a world of difference when operating from batteries.

Very high volume applications may justify using an OEM only for the glass and implementing your own control electronics from the glass up. This is especially true when designing a very small form factor device where the added flexibility of using your own PCB layout is critical to success. For those designing from the glass up, the primary interface will be drivers for the thin film transistors. The stable common voltage reference to which all pixels are referenced is key. This is called VCOM and several discrete and integrated solutions for generating a VCOM signal are available.

One effective solution is to use the National Semiconductor LMH6640MF/NOPB which is a rail-to-rail (up to 16 volts), voltage feedback, high output (up to 100 ma) amplifier optimized for TFT transistor driving. The fast 170 V/µS slew rate yields a 28 MHz full power bandwidth (at five volts) and its small SOT-23 package can be fit into tight spaces (see Figure 3).

The larger the panel, the more current will be required to operate the transistors. For larger panels, another contender is the Maxim MAX9550EZK+T which can drive up to 800 ma peaks up to 20 volts. It settles to within 0.1 percent in less than 2 µSec and features a soft start circuit to limit inrush current during startup. Note, the VCOM level is usually set between the upper voltage level and ground instead of being set to ground. This allows full scale alternating polarity to be driven to the pixels without the need for a negative power supply.

Also , the VCOM function and all its subtleties are often times integrated into more encompassing TFT driver chips like Texas Instruments’ LM8207MT/NOPB which combines an 18 channel gamma corrected driver with VCOM referencing buffer (see Figure 4). Note that the built-in VCOM buffer will allow a buffer tree to be created from a single reference for larger displays.

One approach to driving a TFT display without the need for a higher end processor is to use a discrete TFT controller chip that can be interfaced to a processor of lesser horsepower. An example is the Intersil TW8811-LD2-GR TFT controller chip (see Figure 5).

Aimed at a specific market segment, in this case automotive applications, the TW8811 combines control and even video standard (analog, RGB, S-Video, NTSC, PAL, and Secam) integration into a single chip controller. It supports and ties together different video sources to allow the same display to be used for navigation systems, engine displays, environmental control, in-car entertainment systems, backup cameras, etc.

The on-chip SDRAM interface provides the depth and cost-effective performance needed for displays up to WXGA resolutions, and the –40 to +85 degree temperature range makes this usable for a variety of harsh environment applications.

If a single microcontroller can control the task at hand as well as the embedded display, this is usually the most cost-effective solution. Most people will use a TFT module which already houses the VCOM, gamma correction, and TFT transistor drivers. As a result, the interface to the module is TTL, CMOS, or Low Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS).

Thankfully, to help make TFT design tasks doable in a reasonable amount of time, the chip makers provide solutions targeted at display designs. Typically, these are higher-end, 32-bit, RISC-type processor architectures with streamlined peripherals and resources that handle both display-oriented and non-display-oriented functions such as communications, sensor interfacing, etc.

Devices like this need development environments and evaluation units and NXP is right there. The DK-57VTS-LPC2478 is a programmer’s development system that includes a 5.7 inch TFT with touch interface as well (see Figure 6). Note the 2M x 32 SDRAM for page buffering and graphic manipulations. NXP also offers the DK-57TS-LPC2478 which aims at sensor-based applications.

NXP Semiconductors is not alone by any means. Renesas Electronics America also provides processors with built-in support for TFTs. Take for example the DF2378RVFQ34V, an H8-based processor with advanced block transfer functionality built into the DMA. Like the NXP parts, it incorporates a slew of peripherals, Flash, memory interfaces, and I/O.

Not every processor needs to have a dedicated TFT interface to make it a viable candidate. For example, the TI TMS470R1B1MPGEA is a RISC-based 60 MHz ARM7 processor that can easily interface to a slew of TFT modules that are driven via a digital interface. While some modules need constant refreshing, others can be loaded with display data and generate all the timing and display data movement internally unburdening the host CPU. The CPU must be fast enough to keep up with any animations or video if this is the case.

Many displays are readily available as test vehicles. Many of these can be directly driven with the processors mentioned here. Many other processors can also be used, like offerings from Atmel (AT91SAM9261B-CU) and STMicroelectronics (STM32F107VBT6).

No matter how many data sheets you read, what it boils down to is this: a display is a visual device. What will ultimately make the decision is how it looks when you display your screens on it.

Display technology has moved forward at light speed. For years, even sophisticated equipment made do with numeric and alphanumeric display technology, buttons, and LEDs.

With mass production, manufacturing refinements, and competition, thin film transistor (TFT) displays have drastically dropped in price while dramatically improving in performance. They are the de facto standard to the point where it is not only expected, it is demanded that any modern user interface be full color, brightly backlit, touch sensitive, and have high video speeds and a good viewing angle.

While simple low-cost 8-bit microcontrollers could easily handle the multiplexed 7- and 14-segment LED and alphanumeric LCD displays, the memory, processor speeds, and peripheral resources needed to drive a TFT are more than most modest microcontrollers can handle. As a result, dedicated controller chips, embedded modules, or faster, denser, and more streamlined processor architectures are needed.

This article looks at the factors that make a good MCU-to-TFT interface. This includes memory depths and architectures, paging, data transfer, signaling levels, interfaces, and on-chip peripherals to look for when selecting a microcontroller for a TFT application. It examines the TFT technology and present day product offerings, which your designs will need to drive. It also looks at some microcontrollers that provide native support for color TFT displays, looking at their techniques, features, trade-offs, and limitations. All displays, microcontrollers, drivers, inverters, and development tools mentioned in this article are available from Digi-Key Corporation.

TFT displays are a type of liquid crystal display in which the transistor controlling the pixel’s crystal is etched into a layer of amorphous silicon deposited on the glass (see Figure 1). As in an IC process, very small transistors are geometrically formed. The small size of the transistor means it will not significantly attenuate the light passing through.

The advantage of TFTs is that they are fast enough for video, provide a large and smooth color palette, and are pixel addressable through an electronic two-dimensional control matrix (see Figure 2). Most low-cost displays use an amorphous silicon crystal layer deposited onto the glass through a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition.

Figure 2: Electronically, a stable VCOM reference is used throughout the display, and the gamma corrected drive voltage passes through each transistor.

Many versions of TFT technologies have led us to the modern displays. Early complaints like poor viewing angles, poor contrast, and poor backlighting have been addressed. Better light sources, diffusers, and polarizers make many displays very vivid, some even claiming to be daylight readable. Modern day techniques like in-plane switching improve viewing angles by making the crystals move in a parallel direction to the display plane instead of vertically. Better speeds and contrasts of modern display make them high performance for a fairly low cost.

Since TFTs are not emissive devices, they require backlighting. The most commonly deployed backlight technology is cold cathode florescent lighting (CCFL). These devices were designed, chosen, and used because they are very efficient and have very long lives. Typically, a CCFL bulb is rated as having in the ball park of a 50,000 hour ‘half-life. ’ This means that after 50,000 hours, it still works, but with half the intensity when it was new.

Modern displays, especially the smaller ones, have transitioned to white LED-based backlights. These are easier to manufacture, do not require the high voltage inverter which CCFL bulbs need, and are approaching a lower cost point compared to CCFL technology. Both CCFL and LED technologies will use diffuser layers inside the stackup to evenly distribute light. LED-based backlights may actually be side lights and use a lightpipe structure to distribute the light.

Transflective technology is steadily improving and is available in some TFT displays. This is where both a backlight and ambient external light are used to make the display visible. Sunlight may make it viewable, but generally speaking the transflective displays are less transmissive. This means that the backlight will have to be brighter (and require more power) to be on par with a purely transmissive display that requires a backlight all the time.

With TFT and most color display technologies, an individual pixel contains a red, a green, and a blue picture element (pel). The relative intensity of each color will determine the resulting blended color.

Some displays will use dithering and alternating pixel colors to achieve a better blend of intermediate colors. Higher frame rates are also used since the persistence effect of phosphor-based displays does not carry over to LCDs. Determine the quality and smoothness of the display you will use. Not every frame rate control technique yields flicker- and jitter-free performance, especially at some resolutions. If you notice it, so will your customers and end users of your design.

The memory required to map the display image is key. While some micros will contain enough memory to hold a single page of display data (and not much else), you can see that a lot of memory is required for even a modest ¼ VGA display. This is more than what a typical microcontroller can house (see Table 1). As a result, an external bus interface to external RAM (SRAM, DRAM, or SDRAM) will be needed, especially if paging will be used.

Table 1: The memory required to map to a display is proportional to three times the square of the resolution because of the three color elements of each pixel.

Paging will allow better display quality since one page can be displayed while the next is being built in the background, then made live. This eliminates ghosting and image flicker when graphics are changing rapidly in effects like scrolling, moving sprites (graphical objects), color shade blending (for overlapping graphics as they move), etc.

A key feature when selecting a microcontroller for TFT interfacing is the DMA support. Multi-channel, flexible DMA will make a world of difference, especially when it comes to moving data between pages, character generator and rendering tables, animations and video. Along these lines, a preprogrammed and autonomous DMA functionality will allow you to refresh a display while the core microcontroller goes to sleep. This is a key power-reducing feature that can make a world of difference when operating from batteries.

Very high volume applications may justify using an OEM only for the glass and implementing your own control electronics from the glass up. This is especially true when designing a very small form factor device where the added flexibility of using your own PCB layout is critical to success. For those designing from the glass up, the primary interface will be drivers for the thin film transistors. The stable common voltage reference to which all pixels are referenced is key. This is called VCOM and several discrete and integrated solutions for generating a VCOM signal are available.

One effective solution is to use the National Semiconductor LMH6640MF/NOPB which is a rail-to-rail (up to 16 volts), voltage feedback, high output (up to 100 ma) amplifier optimized for TFT transistor driving. The fast 170 V/µS slew rate yields a 28 MHz full power bandwidth (at five volts) and its small SOT-23 package can be fit into tight spaces (see Figure 3).

The larger the panel, the more current will be required to operate the transistors. For larger panels, another contender is the Maxim MAX9550EZK+T which can drive up to 800 ma peaks up to 20 volts. It settles to within 0.1 percent in less than 2 µSec and features a soft start circuit to limit inrush current during startup. Note, the VCOM level is usually set between the upper voltage level and ground instead of being set to ground. This allows full scale alternating polarity to be driven to the pixels without the need for a negative power supply.

Also , the VCOM function and all its subtleties are often times integrated into more encompassing TFT driver chips like Texas Instruments’ LM8207MT/NOPB which combines an 18 channel gamma corrected driver with VCOM referencing buffer (see Figure 4). Note that the built-in VCOM buffer will allow a buffer tree to be created from a single reference for larger displays.

One approach to driving a TFT display without the need for a higher end processor is to use a discrete TFT controller chip that can be interfaced to a processor of lesser horsepower. An example is the Intersil TW8811-LD2-GR TFT controller chip (see Figure 5).

Aimed at a specific market segment, in this case automotive applications, the TW8811 combines control and even video standard (analog, RGB, S-Video, NTSC, PAL, and Secam) integration into a single chip controller. It supports and ties together different video sources to allow the same display to be used for navigation systems, engine displays, environmental control, in-car entertainment systems, backup cameras, etc.

The on-chip SDRAM interface provides the depth and cost-effective performance needed for displays up to WXGA resolutions, and the –40 to +85 degree temperature range makes this usable for a variety of harsh environment applications.

If a single microcontroller can control the task at hand as well as the embedded display, this is usually the most cost-effective solution. Most people will use a TFT module which already houses the VCOM, gamma correction, and TFT transistor drivers. As a result, the interface to the module is TTL, CMOS, or Low Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS).

Thankfully, to help make TFT design tasks doable in a reasonable amount of time, the chip makers provide solutions targeted at display designs. Typically, these are higher-end, 32-bit, RISC-type processor architectures with streamlined peripherals and resources that handle both display-oriented and non-display-oriented functions such as communications, sensor interfacing, etc.

Devices like this need development environments and evaluation units and NXP is right there. The DK-57VTS-LPC2478 is a programmer’s development system that includes a 5.7 inch TFT with touch interface as well (see Figure 6). Note the 2M x 32 SDRAM for page buffering and graphic manipulations. NXP also offers the DK-57TS-LPC2478 which aims at sensor-based applications.

NXP Semiconductors is not alone by any means. Renesas Electronics America also provides processors with built-in support for TFTs. Take for example the DF2378RVFQ34V, an H8-based processor with advanced block transfer functionality built into the DMA. Like the NXP parts, it incorporates a slew of peripherals, Flash, memory interfaces, and I/O.

Not every processor needs to have a dedicated TFT interface to make it a viable candidate. For example, the TI TMS470R1B1MPGEA is a RISC-based 60 MHz ARM7 processor that can easily interface to a slew of TFT modules that are driven via a digital interface. While some modules need constant refreshing, others can be loaded with display data and generate all the timing and display data movement internally unburdening the host CPU. The CPU must be fast enough to keep up with any animations or video if this is the case.

Many displays are readily available as test vehicles. Many of these can be directly driven with the processors mentioned here. Many other processors can also be used, like offerings from Atmel (AT91SAM9261B-CU) and STMicroelectronics (STM32F107VBT6).

No matter how many data sheets you read, what it boils down to is this: a display is a visual device. What will ultimately make the decision is how it looks when you display your screens on it.

This paper presents a novel 2-D-3-D switchable gate driver circuit for active-matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCDs) applications using the hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) technology. While consisting of 12 thin-film transistors (TFTs), the proposed gate driver circuit includes a pull-up circuit, two alternative circuits, and a key pull-down circuit. To provide a stable output waveform for switching between the 2-D and 3-D modes in AMLCD panel, the proposed circuit can improve the…Expand

As an option, you can order this TFT pre-assembled onto a breakout/carrier board. The board allows easy prototyping through its 0.1" headers. You can also include the carrier board in your end product to simplify construction and assembly.

This development kit includes everything needed to get started with the 3.5" EVE module: a 320x240 display mounted on an EVE2 graphically accelerated PCBA, a Seeeduino, an EVE breakout board, jumper wires, USB cable and a ribbon cable. We even assemble this kit and pre-load some demonstration software so that you can have a functioning module in your hands within seconds.

Because the display module includes an EVE (embedded video engine) chip, it"s a perfect choice for an HMI. EVE is a graphics controller solution that can control both display and audio operations. Additionally, Bridgetek/FTDI supports the EVE chip with graphical design toolchains to aid in development.

This kit consists of a CFAF320240F-035T a 320x240 3.5" Full Color TFT LCD module mounted on a carrier board (CFA-10074). The carrier board supports a current driver for the LED backlight of the display.

This TFT LCD display module is perfect for the designer who"s looking to have a graphic and audio processor already embedded in the display unit. Powered by an FTDI/BridgeTek FT810 Embedded Video Engine (EVE) graphics accelerator chip, simply send over a few commands via SPI or I2C and the EVE will put your stored image up on the display. Need to draw a line, create dials/knobs/buttons, or rotate an image? Send a handful of bytes and the EVE will take care of it.

Different displays have different characteristics, just tell Panox Display your application, and operating environment, Panox Display will suggest a suitable display for you.

But Panox Display is not a school, if customers don`t know the basic knowledge to design circuit boards, we suggest using our controller board to drive the display.

First, you need to check whether this display has On-cell or In-cell touch panel, if has, it only needs to add a cover glass on it. If not, it needs an external touch panel.

If you don`t know or don`t want to write a display program on Raspberry Pi, it`s better to get an HDMI controller board from us, and Panox Display will send a config.txt file for reference.

Smart TFT LCD display embeds LCD driver, controller and MCU, sets engineer free from tedious UI & touch screen programming. Using Smart TFT LCD module, our customers greatly reduce product"s time-to-market and BOM cost.