ips lcd display phones free sample

2023-01-03 12:32:11

Market forces made us endure screens interrupted with various sorts of notches and cutouts for a considerable time, but that’s all about to end soon. In the last few years, we have seen the Android community evolve from hating notches to being indifferent towards them. But living with the new wave of bezel-less, full-view display phones has convinced us that the world is better off without notches and it’s imperative that natural order be restored to our phone screens. (हिंदी में पढ़िए)

For now, most of the true full-view and notch-less display phones use Pop-up cameras or sliders, but a few tech giants including Samsung, Oppo, and Xiaomi have already demonstrated prototypes or released phones that place the front camera behind the screen.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G is the world’s first commercially available phone with an under-display camera (UDC). The main screen of this foldable phone is a 7.6-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a 22.5:18 aspect ratio, QXGA+ (2208 x 1768) resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and 374ppi. Thanks to that UDC, you get a 88.57 % screen to body ratio.

Rest, the device runs on a Snapdragon 888 chipset, 12GB LPDDR5 RAM, 256/512GB UFS 3.1 storage, 4400mAh with 25W fast charging, and a penta-camera setup.

Xiaomi’s Mi Mix 4 is yet another under-screen camera phone. It calls its implementation CUP (Camera Under Panel), but the mechanism is pretty much the same as the other under-display selfie cameras out there. Above its 20MP selfie camera lies 400ppi pixels of the screen. This display stretches 6.67-inches and sports 120Hz refresh rate.

It ships with Snapdragon 888+ processor, 8GB/12GB RAM, 128GB/512GB storage, 4,500mAh battery and has 120W wired charging, 108MP camera, and Harman/Kardon speakers.

Asus Zenfone 8 Flip has a 6.67-inch (2400 × 1080 pixels) Full HD+ E4 AMOLED HDR10+ display with 90Hz refresh rate, 200Hz touch sampling rate, 110% DCI-P3 color coverage, up to 1000 nits brightness, and Corning Gorilla Glass 6 protection. This full screen fascia is possible thanks to a flip camera module.

OnePlus was one of the first few Android OEMs to usher in a notch, and it’s also one of the first in the premium segment to get rid with OnePlus 7 Pro (review). It further continued the trend with OnePlus 7T Pro which comes with a gorgeous true full-view display with extremely narrow bezels.

The 90Hz refresh rate makes it super smooth, the resolution goes all the way up to 2K, and, there are those slick curves at the edges. The phone is powered by Snapdragon 855 octa-core chipset paired with high-quality UFS 3.1 storage and LPDDR4X RAM. On the downside, the 7 Pro is big and bulky, is missing the audio jack, and has a mediocre set of cameras.

The elevating module opens like a fin and also makes room for the earpiece and LED flash. Anyway, the result is an immersive full-view AMOLED display that extends edge to edge. The Reno 10X Zoom has flagship-grade specs, including the Snapdragon 855, but all the tech housed within makes it a tad thick and heavy.

The Galaxy A80 is the only phone from Samsung with an AMOLED screen that extends edge to edge. Yes, even the high-end S-series and Note-series flagships rely on cutouts or punch holes to accommodate the front camera.

The 6Z (globally known as the Zenfone 6) is one of the most impressive phones we have seen from Asus in India. The 6Z (review) has a gorgeous and well-calibrated IPS LCD display that covers the entire facia. The selfie camera is housed in a flip module and this glass body phone houses a massive 5000mAh battery while being reasonably manageable.

The 6.4-inch screen has Full HD resolution which is quite sharp considering this is an IPS LCD and not AMOLED screen. This competitively priced Snapdragon 855-powered phone also has stereo speakers, 48MP primary camera, and runs an extremely close-to-stock version of Zen UI.

Xiaomi’s Redmi K20 Pro (review) brandishes an impressive set of specs that you’d otherwise find on phones priced significantly higher. With the K20 Pro, Xiaomi pays due attention to design and the phone gets a full-view AMOLED display (6.4-inch, full HD+) with an in-display fingerprint sensor lying underneath.

As is the case with most other Xiaomi phones, the K20 Pro is a great value proposition. Key features include triple rear cameras, 4000mAh battery with fast charging support, and MIUI 10 interface with fewer ads.

Oppo Reno, which is a trimmed-down version of the Oppo Reno 10X Zoom, has the same design with shark-fin pop-up and is also slimmer and significantly lighter. The handset has a 6.4-inch AMOLED display (Full HD) with around 87% screen-to-body ratio that targets DCI-P3 color gamut and is shielded by Gorilla Glass variant.

This one is missing 10X lossless zoom and Snapdragon 855, but the 48MP primary rear camera and SD 710 chipset should still be a good deal for light and moderate user.

Motorola One Fusion Plus rocks a 6.5-inch full HD+ notch-less TFT-LCD screen. It’s pop-up camera houses a 16MP sensor. Pivot and by the back you get a 64MP quartet.

The Realme X (review) is a very competent phone that includes trendy features like a full-view AMOLED screen with minimal bezels on three sides, in-display fingerprint sensor, and pop-up camera – all for a sub Rs. 20,000 price.

The handset also comes in catchy onion and garlic gradients that look extremely premium. Other highlights include VOOC 3.0 fast charging, 48MP rear camera, and Snapdragon 710 chipset.

Redmi K20 passes on most of what’s good with the Redmi K20 Pro at a lower price point. The handset has the same design as the Pro variant and the same immersive full-view AMOLED display.

The Redmi K20 is however driven by Snapdragon 730 and replaces the Sony 48MP sensor with a Samsung sensor of the same resolution. Other features include in-display fingerprint reader, Pop-up camera, and 4000mAh battery with fast charging.

The Vivo 15 Pro has been around for a while, but it’s still a relevant option, especially at the new price. Both the V15 Pro and V15 employ a pop-up front camera and have a full-view display. The Pro variant, however, benefits from a better AMOLED screen and is powered by Snapdragon 675.

Huawei Y9 Prime is the first Huawei phone in India to deliver a full-view screen. The IPS LCD display on the phone measures 6.59-inch and is full HD sharp.

The handset is powered by Kirin 710 octa-core chipset paired with 4GB RAM and 128GB storage. Other features include triple rear cameras, 4000mAh battery, and Android Pie based EMUI 10 software.

Samsung has developed one of the best full-view display devices globally. One such example of the same is the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. The smartphone has a 6.9-inch dynamic AMOLED display complemented with a 120HZ refresh rate. The device has 12GB RAM and 256GB internal storage that can be expanded up to 1TB via a microSD card. It is powered by Samsung’s own Exynos 9 series processor.

iQOO took the whole market by storm with the launch of the iQOO 9 Pro 5G. The smartphone stands as a strong competitor of devices like the OnePlus 9 Pro in the market. It comes with a 6.78-inch AMOLED display that also has a 120Hz refresh rate to offer a smoother experience. The smartphone runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor paired with 12GB RAM and 256GB internal storage in the high-end variant of the device.

The Xiaomi 12 Pro could be hailed as one of the best devices launched by the company so far. The smartphone has a 6.73-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate The smartphone works on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor for high-speed performance, It also has 8GB RAM and 256GB internal storage to store all your data.

The flagship devices by Vivo have always amazed the users in terms of camera prowess, performance, and display capabilities. Vivo X70 Pro follows the same trend with its 6.56-inch AMOLED display coupled with a 120Hz refresh rate. Though we will say that the smartphone lags behind in terms of the processor as it has a MediaTek Dimensity 1200 processor. Apart from that, it has 8GB RAM and 128GB internal storage that cannot be expanded.

The OnePlus 10 series failed to make an impact like the OnePlus 9 series due to the changes and experiments. Still, the OnePlus 10 Pro was something which the audience loved because of the specs. The device works on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor with 12GB RAM and 256GB internal storage. The smartphone comes equipped with a Fluid AMOLED display and 120Hz refresh rate.

The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE packs a compact 6.4-inch Dynamic AMOLED display along with a 120Hz refresh rate. The device runs on the Samsung Exynos 2100 processor accompanied by 8GB RAM and 128GB internal storage that is non-expandable in nature. The smartphone operates on the Android 12 operating system offering the user a snappy interface without lots of bloatware.

ips lcd display phones free sample

A key ingredient for a smooth gaming experience is the refresh rate of the display. While high-refresh-rate screens were a thing of gaming PCs, the trend has slowly crossed over to mobile phones. From 90Hz, the flagships of the industry have moved to 120Hz this year. You got handsets like iPhone 11 series, S20 series, OnePlus 8 Pro, and more. The obvious next step is 144Hz and there are already a few candidates out there.

While we have a dedicated articleon everything you need to know about the high-refresh-rate tech, just know that higher the refresh rate (measured in Hertz/Hz), the display will refresh the on-screen image or content that much faster. Everything will seem smooth and snappier to you. You’ll feel less eye fatigue.

But all that’s not going to stop the trend of high-refresh-rate displays on smartphones, at least in the case of flagships for now. The brands will market it as a USP and milk it as much as possible.

Currently, Snapdragon 865, Snapdragon 765, and MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chips support 144Hz refresh rate displays. So, the devices mentioned below will be running on any of these three. Having cleared that, let’s get down to the list itself.

The device comes with a 6.6-inch IPS LCD display along with a 144Hz refresh rate. It works on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 processor paired with 6GB RAM along with 128GB internal storage.

Asus recently introduced the ROG Phone 6 which is of course a flagship gaming device with decent specifications. The smartphone comes equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 processor paired with 12GB RAM and 256GB internal storage. Not this one is a special mention here in our list as the smartphone has a 6.78-inch AMOLED display complemented with a whopping 165Hz refresh rate. No doubt in saying that the smartphone is a boon for all gamers.

Motorola launched two new smartphones in the Edge 30 series including Moto Edge 30 and Moto Edge 30 Pro. Both the smartphones ship with a P-OLED display coupled with a 144Hz refresh rate. The base variant’s screen is around 6.5-inch and the high-end variant has a 6.7-inch display.

The rear camera system of both smartphones is identical consisting of a 50MP primary sensor, 50MP secondary sensor, and a 2MP tertiary sensor. Edge 30 flaunts a 32MP snapper and the Pro variant has a 60MP sensor at the front. While the base variant gets a 4020mAh battery and the Edge 30 Pro ships with a 4800mAh battery.

Realme has no doubt surprised the customers by offering amazing features at unbelievable prices. One such example is the Realme 9 5G SE which ships with the Snapdragon 778 processor along with 6GB RAM.

The smartphone also has 128GB of internal storage that can be expanded up to 1TB via a microSD card. The device comes equipped with a 6.6-inches IPS LCD display complemented with a 144Hz refresh rate.

Asus has proved its mantle when it comes to producing gaming smartphones with the ROG series. The smartphone features a 6.78-inch AMOLED display along with a 144Hz refresh rate. The device is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus processor accompanied with 8GB RAM along with 128GB internal storage. The smartphone is based on the Android 11 operating system and an in-display fingerprint scanner.

Nubia RedMagic is the company’s crown-jewel catered to gamers. As such, you get a buttery-smooth 144Hz display on the face along with a 300Hz sampling rate. This should result in a minimal touch input latency during gameplay.

It’s a watered-down version of the former. Thus, it ships with the Snapdragon 765G, up to 8GB RAM, up to 256GB storage, and 5100mAh battery with 30W snappy charging support. It also retains the capacitive shoulder triggers and dual-mode 5G support found on the RedMagic.

iQoo Z1 5G has an IPS LCD panel with a 144Hz variable refresh rate and a punch hole for the selfie camera. Core config is powerful enough to entice gamers – there is MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus chipset that’s paired with up to 8GB RAM and up to256GB of storage.

Mi 10T Pro flaunts a 6.67-inch 144Hz LCD display. It is of FHD+ resolution and comes with Gorilla Glass 5 protection. In the left-corner hole resides the phone’s 20MP selfie snapper.

The industry is slowly picking up this display metric. Since we have got a lot many 90Hz and 120Hz phones, it won’t be too long before we see a swarm of 144Hz phones. At least, that’s what we look forward to in the flagship phones.

ips lcd display phones free sample

Super AMOLED (S-AMOLED) and Super LCD (IPS-LCD) are two display types used in different kinds of electronics. The former is an improvement on OLED, while Super LCD is an advanced form of LCD.

All things considered, Super AMOLED is probably the better choice over Super LCD, assuming you have a choice, but it"s not quite as simple as that in every situation. Keep reading for more on how these display technologies differ and how to decide which is best for you.

S-AMOLED, a shortened version of Super AMOLED, stands for super active-matrix organic light-emitting diode. It"s a display type that uses organic materials to produce light for each pixel.

One component of Super AMOLED displays is that the layer that detects touch is embedded directly into the screen instead of existing as an entirely separate layer. This is what makes S-AMOLED different from AMOLED.

Super LCD is the same as IPS LCD, which stands forin-plane switching liquid crystal display. It"s the name given to an LCD screen that utilizes in-plane switching (IPS) panels. LCD screens use a backlight to produce light for all the pixels, and each pixel shutter can be turned off to affect its brightness.

There isn"t an easy answer as to which display is better when comparing Super AMOLED and IPS LCD. The two are similar in some ways but different in others, and it often comes down to opinion as to how one performs over the other in real-world scenarios.

However, there are some real differences between them that do determine how various aspects of the display works, which is an easy way to compare the hardware.

For example, one quick consideration is that you should choose S-AMOLED if you prefer deeper blacks and brighter colors because those areas are what makes AMOLED screens stand out. However, you might instead opt for Super LCD if you want sharper images and like to use your device outdoors.

S-AMOLED displays are much better at revealing dark black because each pixel that needs to be black can be true black since the light can be shut off for each pixel. This isn"t true with Super LCD screens since the backlight is still on even if some pixels need to be black, and this can affect the darkness of those areas of the screen.

What"s more is that since blacks can be truly black on Super AMOLED screens, the other colors are much more vibrant. When the pixels can be turned off completely to create black, the contrast ratio goes through the roof with AMOLED displays, since that ratio is the brightest whites the screen can produce against its darkest blacks.

However, since LCD screens have backlights, it sometimes appears as though the pixels are closer together, producing an overall sharper and more natural effect. AMOLED screens, when compared to LCD, might look over-saturated or unrealistic, and the whites might appear slightly yellow.

When using the screen outdoors in bright light, Super LCD is sometimes said to be easier to use, but S-AMOLED screens have fewer layers of glass and so reflect less light, so there isn"t really a clear-cut answer to how they compare in direct light.

Another consideration when comparing the color quality of a Super LCD screen with a Super AMOLED screen is that the AMOLED display slowly loses its vibrant color and saturation as the organic compounds break down, although this usually takes a very long time and even then might not be noticeable.

Without backlight hardware, and with the added bonus of only one screen carrying the touch and display components, the overall size of an S-AMOLED screen tends to be smaller than that of an IPS LCD screen.

This is one advantage that S-AMOLED displays have when it comes to smartphones in particular, since this technology can make them thinner than those that use IPS LCD.

Since IPS-LCD displays have a backlight that requires more power than a traditional LCD screen, devices that utilize those screens need more power than those that use S-AMOLED, which doesn"t need a backlight.

That said, since each pixel of a Super AMOLED display can be fine-tuned for each color requirement, power consumption can, in some situations, be higher than with Super LCD.

For example, playing a video with lots of black areas on an S-AMOLED display will save power compared to an IPS LCD screen since the pixels can be effectively shut off and then no light needs to be produced. On the other hand, displaying lots of color all day would most likely affect the Super AMOLED battery more than it would the device using the Super LCD screen.

An IPS LCD screen includes a backlight while S-AMOLED screens don"t, but they also have an additional layer that supports touch, whereas Super AMOLED displays have that built right into the screen.

For these reasons and others (like color quality and battery performance), it"s probably safe to say that S-AMOLED screens are more expensive to build, and so devices that use them are also more expensive than their LCD counterparts.

ips lcd display phones free sample

If you want to buy a new monitor, you might wonder what kind of display technologies I should choose. In today’s market, there are two main types of computer monitors: TFT LCD monitors & IPS monitors.

The word TFT means Thin Film Transistor. It is the technology that is used in LCD displays. We have additional resources if you would like to learn more about what is a TFT Display. This type of LCDs is also categorically referred to as an active-matrix LCD.

These LCDs can hold back some pixels while using other pixels so the LCD screen will be using a very minimum amount of energy to function (to modify the liquid crystal molecules between two electrodes). TFT LCDs have capacitors and transistors. These two elements play a key part in ensuring that the TFT display monitor functions by using a very small amount of energy while still generating vibrant, consistent images.

Industry nomenclature: TFT LCD panels or TFT screens can also be referred to as TN (Twisted Nematic) Type TFT displays or TN panels, or TN screen technology.

IPS (in-plane-switching) technology is like an improvement on the traditional TFT LCD display module in the sense that it has the same basic structure, but has more enhanced features and more widespread usability.

These LCD screens offer vibrant color, high contrast, and clear images at wide viewing angles. At a premium price. This technology is often used in high definition screens such as in gaming or entertainment.

Both TFT display and IPS display are active-matrix displays, neither can’t emit light on their own like OLED displays and have to be used with a back-light of white bright light to generate the picture. Newer panels utilize LED backlight (light-emitting diodes) to generate their light hence utilizing less power and requiring less depth by design. Neither TFT display nor IPS display can produce color, there is a layer of RGB (red, green, blue) color filter in each LCD pixels to produce the color consumers see. If you use a magnifier to inspect your monitor, you will see RGB color in each pixel. With an on/off switch and different level of brightness RGB, we can get many colors.

Winner. IPS TFT screens have around 0.3 milliseconds response time while TN TFT screens responds around 10 milliseconds which makes the latter unsuitable for gaming

Winner. the images that IPS displays create are much more pristine and original than that of the TFT screen. IPS displays do this by making the pixels function in a parallel way. Because of such placing, the pixels can reflect light in a better way, and because of that, you get a better image within the display.

As the display screen made with IPS technology is mostly wide-set, it ensures that the aspect ratio of the screen would be wider. This ensures better visibility and a more realistic viewing experience with a stable effect.

Winner. While the TFT LCD has around 15% more power consumption vs IPS LCD, IPS has a lower transmittance which forces IPS displays to consume more power via backlights. TFT LCD helps battery life.

Normally, high-end products, such as Apple Mac computer monitors and Samsung mobile phones, generally use IPS panels. Some high-end TV and mobile phones even use AMOLED (Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diodes) displays. This cutting edge technology provides even better color reproduction, clear image quality, better color gamut, less power consumption when compared to LCD technology.

What you need to choose is AMOLED for your TV and mobile phones instead of PMOLED. If you have budget leftover, you can also add touch screen functionality as most of the touch nowadays uses PCAP (Projective Capacitive) touch panel.

This kind of touch technology was first introduced by Steve Jobs in the first-generation iPhone. Of course, a TFT LCD display can always meet the basic needs at the most efficient price. An IPS display can make your monitor standing out.

ips lcd display phones free sample

IPS (in-plane switching) is a screen technology for liquid-crystal displays (LCDs). In IPS, a layer of liquid crystals is sandwiched between two glass surfaces. The liquid crystal molecules are aligned parallel to those surfaces in predetermined directions (in-plane). The molecules are reoriented by an applied electric field, whilst remaining essentially parallel to the surfaces to produce an image. It was designed to solve the strong viewing angle dependence and low-quality color reproduction of the twisted nematic field effect (TN) matrix LCDs prevalent in the late 1980s.

The TN method was the only viable technology for active matrix TFT LCDs in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Early panels showed grayscale inversion from up to down,Vertical Alignment (VA)—that could resolve these weaknesses and were applied to large computer monitor panels.

Shortly thereafter, Hitachi of Japan filed patents to improve this technology. A leader in this field was Katsumi Kondo, who worked at the Hitachi Research Center.thin-film transistor array as a matrix and to avoid undesirable stray fields in between pixels.Super IPS). NEC and Hitachi became early manufacturers of active-matrix addressed LCDs based on the IPS technology. This is a milestone for implementing large-screen LCDs having acceptable visual performance for flat-panel computer monitors and television screens. In 1996, Samsung developed the optical patterning technique that enables multi-domain LCD. Multi-domain and in-plane switching subsequently remain the dominant LCD designs through 2006.

IPS technology is widely used in panels for TVs, tablet computers, and smartphones. In particular, most IBM products was marketed as CCFL backlighting, and all Apple Inc. products marketed with the label backlighting since 2010.

Most panels also support true 8-bit-per-channel colour. These improvements came at the cost of a lower response time, initially about 50 ms. IPS panels were also extremely expensive.

IPS has since been superseded by S-IPS (Super-IPS, Hitachi Ltd. in 1998), which has all the benefits of IPS technology with the addition of improved pixel refresh timing.

In this case, both linear polarizing filters P and A have their axes of transmission in the same direction. To obtain the 90 degree twisted nematic structure of the LC layer between the two glass plates without an applied electric field (OFF state), the inner surfaces of the glass plates are treated to align the bordering LC molecules at a right angle. This molecular structure is practically the same as in TN LCDs. However, the arrangement of the electrodes e1 and e2 is different. Because they are in the same plane and on a single glass plate, they generate an electric field essentially parallel to this plate. The diagram is not to scale: the LC layer is only a few micrometers thick and so is very small compared with the distance between the electrodes.

Unlike TN LCDs, IPS panels do not lighten or show tailing when touched. This is important for touch-screen devices, such as smartphones and tablet computers.

Toward the end of 2010 Samsung Electronics introduced Super PLS (Plane-to-Line Switching) with the intent of providing an alternative to the popular IPS technology which is primarily manufactured by LG Display. It is an "IPS-type" panel technology, and is very similar in performance features, specs and characteristics to LG Display"s offering. Samsung adopted PLS panels instead of AMOLED panels, because in the past AMOLED panels had difficulties in realizing full HD resolution on mobile devices. PLS technology was Samsung"s wide-viewing angle LCD technology, similar to LG Display"s IPS technology.

In 2012 AU Optronics began investment in their own IPS-type technology, dubbed AHVA. This should not be confused with their long standing AMVA technology (which is a VA-type technology). Performance and specs remained very similar to LG Display"s IPS and Samsung"s PLS offerings. The first 144 Hz compatible IPS-type panels were produced in late 2014 (used first in early 2015) by AUO, beating Samsung and LG Display to providing high refresh rate IPS-type panels.

Cross, Jason (18 March 2012). "Digital Displays Explained". TechHive. PC World. p. 4. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2015.

"TFT Technology: Enhancing the viewing angle". Riverdi (TFT Module Manufacturer). Archived from the original on 23 April 2016. Retrieved 5 November 2016. However, [twisted nematic] suffers from the phenomenon called gray scale inversion. This means that the display has one viewing side in which the image colors suddenly change after exceeding the specified viewing angle. (see image Inversion Effect) External link in |quote= (help)

tech2 News Staff (19 May 2011). "LG Announces Super High Resolution AH-IPS Displays". Firstpost.com. Archived from the original on 11 December 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015.

Baker, Simon (30 April 2011). "Panel Technologies: TN Film, MVA, PVA and IPS Explained". Tftcentral.co.uk. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2012.

Ivankov, Alex (1 September 2016). "Advantages and disadvantages of IPS screen technology". Version Daily. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 25 September 2017.

"Samsung PLS improves on IPS displays like iPad"s, costs less". electronista.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2012. Retrieved 30 October 2012.

ips lcd display phones free sample

A thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display (TFT LCD) is a variant of a liquid-crystal display that uses thin-film-transistor technologyactive matrix LCD, in contrast to passive matrix LCDs or simple, direct-driven (i.e. with segments directly connected to electronics outside the LCD) LCDs with a few segments.

In February 1957, John Wallmark of RCA filed a patent for a thin film MOSFET. Paul K. Weimer, also of RCA implemented Wallmark"s ideas and developed the thin-film transistor (TFT) in 1962, a type of MOSFET distinct from the standard bulk MOSFET. It was made with thin films of cadmium selenide and cadmium sulfide. The idea of a TFT-based liquid-crystal display (LCD) was conceived by Bernard Lechner of RCA Laboratories in 1968. In 1971, Lechner, F. J. Marlowe, E. O. Nester and J. Tults demonstrated a 2-by-18 matrix display driven by a hybrid circuit using the dynamic scattering mode of LCDs.T. Peter Brody, J. A. Asars and G. D. Dixon at Westinghouse Research Laboratories developed a CdSe (cadmium selenide) TFT, which they used to demonstrate the first CdSe thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display (TFT LCD).active-matrix liquid-crystal display (AM LCD) using CdSe TFTs in 1974, and then Brody coined the term "active matrix" in 1975.high-resolution and high-quality electronic visual display devices use TFT-based active matrix displays.

The liquid crystal displays used in calculators and other devices with similarly simple displays have direct-driven image elements, and therefore a voltage can be easily applied across just one segment of these types of displays without interfering with the other segments. This would be impractical for a large display, because it would have a large number of (color) picture elements (pixels), and thus it would require millions of connections, both top and bottom for each one of the three colors (red, green and blue) of every pixel. To avoid this issue, the pixels are addressed in rows and columns, reducing the connection count from millions down to thousands. The column and row wires attach to transistor switches, one for each pixel. The one-way current passing characteristic of the transistor prevents the charge that is being applied to each pixel from being drained between refreshes to a display"s image. Each pixel is a small capacitor with a layer of insulating liquid crystal sandwiched between transparent conductive ITO layers.

The circuit layout process of a TFT-LCD is very similar to that of semiconductor products. However, rather than fabricating the transistors from silicon, that is formed into a crystalline silicon wafer, they are made from a thin film of amorphous silicon that is deposited on a glass panel. The silicon layer for TFT-LCDs is typically deposited using the PECVD process.

Polycrystalline silicon is sometimes used in displays requiring higher TFT performance. Examples include small high-resolution displays such as those found in projectors or viewfinders. Amorphous silicon-based TFTs are by far the most common, due to their lower production cost, whereas polycrystalline silicon TFTs are more costly and much more difficult to produce.

The twisted nematic display is one of the oldest and frequently cheapest kind of LCD display technologies available. TN displays benefit from fast pixel response times and less smearing than other LCD display technology, but suffer from poor color reproduction and limited viewing angles, especially in the vertical direction. Colors will shift, potentially to the point of completely inverting, when viewed at an angle that is not perpendicular to the display. Modern, high end consumer products have developed methods to overcome the technology"s shortcomings, such as RTC (Response Time Compensation / Overdrive) technologies. Modern TN displays can look significantly better than older TN displays from decades earlier, but overall TN has inferior viewing angles and poor color in comparison to other technology.

Most TN panels can represent colors using only six bits per RGB channel, or 18 bit in total, and are unable to display the 16.7 million color shades (24-bit truecolor) that are available using 24-bit color. Instead, these panels display interpolated 24-bit color using a dithering method that combines adjacent pixels to simulate the desired shade. They can also use a form of temporal dithering called Frame Rate Control (FRC), which cycles between different shades with each new frame to simulate an intermediate shade. Such 18 bit panels with dithering are sometimes advertised as having "16.2 million colors". These color simulation methods are noticeable to many people and highly bothersome to some.gamut (often referred to as a percentage of the NTSC 1953 color gamut) are also due to backlighting technology. It is not uncommon for older displays to range from 10% to 26% of the NTSC color gamut, whereas other kind of displays, utilizing more complicated CCFL or LED phosphor formulations or RGB LED backlights, may extend past 100% of the NTSC color gamut, a difference quite perceivable by the human eye.

The transmittance of a pixel of an LCD panel typically does not change linearly with the applied voltage,sRGB standard for computer monitors requires a specific nonlinear dependence of the amount of emitted light as a function of the RGB value.

Initial iterations of IPS technology were characterised by slow response time and a low contrast ratio but later revisions have made marked improvements to these shortcomings. Because of its wide viewing angle and accurate color reproduction (with almost no off-angle color shift), IPS is widely employed in high-end monitors aimed at professional graphic artists, although with the recent fall in price it has been seen in the mainstream market as well. IPS technology was sold to Panasonic by Hitachi.

Most panels also support true 8-bit per channel color. These improvements came at the cost of a higher response time, initially about 50 ms. IPS panels were also extremely expensive.

IPS has since been superseded by S-IPS (Super-IPS, Hitachi Ltd. in 1998), which has all the benefits of IPS technology with the addition of improved pixel refresh timing.

In 2004, Hydis Technologies Co., Ltd licensed its AFFS patent to Japan"s Hitachi Displays. Hitachi is using AFFS to manufacture high end panels in their product line. In 2006, Hydis also licensed its AFFS to Sanyo Epson Imaging Devices Corporation.

Less expensive PVA panels often use dithering and FRC, whereas super-PVA (S-PVA) panels all use at least 8 bits per color component and do not use color simulation methods.BRAVIA LCD TVs offer 10-bit and xvYCC color support, for example, the Bravia X4500 series. S-PVA also offers fast response times using modern RTC technologies.

A technology developed by Samsung is Super PLS, which bears similarities to IPS panels, has wider viewing angles, better image quality, increased brightness, and lower production costs. PLS technology debuted in the PC display market with the release of the Samsung S27A850 and S24A850 monitors in September 2011.

TFT dual-transistor pixel or cell technology is a reflective-display technology for use in very-low-power-consumption applications such as electronic shelf labels (ESL), digital watches, or metering. DTP involves adding a secondary transistor gate in the single TFT cell to maintain the display of a pixel during a period of 1s without loss of image or without degrading the TFT transistors over time. By slowing the refresh rate of the standard frequency from 60 Hz to 1 Hz, DTP claims to increase the power efficiency by multiple orders of magnitude.

Due to the very high cost of building TFT factories, there are few major OEM panel vendors for large display panels. The glass panel suppliers are as follows:

External consumer display devices like a TFT LCD feature one or more analog VGA, DVI, HDMI, or DisplayPort interface, with many featuring a selection of these interfaces. Inside external display devices there is a controller board that will convert the video signal using color mapping and image scaling usually employing the discrete cosine transform (DCT) in order to convert any video source like CVBS, VGA, DVI, HDMI, etc. into digital RGB at the native resolution of the display panel. In a laptop the graphics chip will directly produce a signal suitable for connection to the built-in TFT display. A control mechanism for the backlight is usually included on the same controller board.

The low level interface of STN, DSTN, or TFT display panels use either single ended TTL 5 V signal for older displays or TTL 3.3 V for slightly newer displays that transmits the pixel clock, horizontal sync, vertical sync, digital red, digital green, digital blue in parallel. Some models (for example the AT070TN92) also feature input/display enable, horizontal scan direction and vertical scan direction signals.

New and large (>15") TFT displays often use LVDS signaling that transmits the same contents as the parallel interface (Hsync, Vsync, RGB) but will put control and RGB bits into a number of serial transmission lines synchronized to a clock whose rate is equal to the pixel rate. LVDS transmits seven bits per clock per data line, with six bits being data and one bit used to signal if the other six bits need to be inverted in order to maintain DC balance. Low-cost TFT displays often have three data lines and therefore only directly support 18 bits per pixel. Upscale displays have four or five data lines to support 24 bits per pixel (truecolor) or 30 bits per pixel respectively. Panel manufacturers are slowly replacing LVDS with Internal DisplayPort and Embedded DisplayPort, which allow sixfold reduction of the number of differential pairs.

The bare display panel will only accept a digital video signal at the resolution determined by the panel pixel matrix designed at manufacture. Some screen panels will ignore the LSB bits of the color information to present a consistent interface (8 bit -> 6 bit/color x3).

With analogue signals like VGA, the display controller also needs to perform a high speed analog to digital conversion. With digital input signals like DVI or HDMI some simple reordering of the bits is needed before feeding it to the rescaler if the input resolution doesn"t match the display panel resolution.

Kawamoto, H. (2012). "The Inventors of TFT Active-Matrix LCD Receive the 2011 IEEE Nishizawa Medal". Journal of Display Technology. 8 (1): 3–4. Bibcode:2012JDisT...8....3K. doi:10.1109/JDT.2011.2177740. ISSN 1551-319X.

Brody, T. Peter; Asars, J. A.; Dixon, G. D. (November 1973). "A 6 × 6 inch 20 lines-per-inch liquid-crystal display panel". 20 (11): 995–1001. Bibcode:1973ITED...20..995B. doi:10.1109/T-ED.1973.17780. ISSN 0018-9383.

K. H. Lee; H. Y. Kim; K. H. Park; S. J. Jang; I. C. Park & J. Y. Lee (June 2006). "A Novel Outdoor Readability of Portable TFT-LCD with AFFS Technology". SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. AIP. 37 (1): 1079–82. doi:10.1889/1.2433159. S2CID 129569963.

Kim, Sae-Bom; Kim, Woong-Ki; Chounlamany, Vanseng; Seo, Jaehwan; Yoo, Jisu; Jo, Hun-Je; Jung, Jinho (15 August 2012). "Identification of multi-level toxicity of liquid crystal display wastewater toward Daphnia magna and Moina macrocopa". Journal of Hazardous Materials. Seoul, Korea; Laos, Lao. 227–228: 327–333. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.059. PMID 22677053.

ips lcd display phones free sample

--- Synthetic ---2022 GPUScore: Sacred Path ( Official 2560x1440 )2022 GPUScore: Sacred Path ( Official Native )2022 GPUScore: Sacred Path ( Official VRS 2560x1440 )2022 GPUScore: The Expedition ( Official 2560x1440 )2022 GPUScore: The Expedition ( Official Native )2022 GPUScore: The Expedition ( Official VRS 2560x1440 )2022 WebXPRT 4 ( Overall Score )2021 CrossMark ( Overall )2021 CrossMark ( Productivity )2021 CrossMark ( Creativity )2021 CrossMark ( Responsiveness )2021 Geekbench ML ( TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 )2021 Geekbench ML ( TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5 )2021 Geekbench ML ( TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5 )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( Sequential Write )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( Sequential Read )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( Random Write 4KB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( Random Read 4KB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( SDCard Random Write 4KB 0.5 GB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( Memory Copy 4MB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( SDCard Random Read 4KB 0.5 GB )2021 Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) ( SDCard Memory Copy 4MB )2021 Antutu v9 ( Total Score )2021 Antutu v9 ( CPU )2021 Antutu v9 ( GPU )2021 Antutu v9 ( MEM )2021 Antutu v9 ( UX )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( System )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( CPU Tests )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( Memory Tests )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( Disk Tests )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( 2D Graphics Tests )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( 3D Graphics Tests )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( Storage Write )2021 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10 ( Storage Read )2020 V-Ray 5 Benchmark ( GPU CUDA )2020 V-Ray 5 Benchmark ( GPU RTX )2020 V-Ray 5 Benchmark ( CPU )2020 Cinebench R23 ( Multi Core )2020 Cinebench R23 ( Single Core )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( CATIA (catia-06) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( CATIA (catia-06) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Creo (creo-03) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Creo (creo-03) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Energy (energy-03) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Energy (energy-03) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Maya (maya-06) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Medical (medical-03) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Maya (maya-06) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Siemens NX (snx-04) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Medical (medical-03) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Solidworks (solidworks-05) 1920x1080 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Siemens NX (snx-04) 3840x2160 )2020 SPECviewperf 2020 v1 ( Solidworks (solidworks-05) 3840x2160 )2020 UL Procyon AI Inference ( Overall Score )2020 AImark ( Score v2.x )2020 AImark ( Score v3.x )2020 Premiere Pro PugetBench ( Overall Score )2020 Premiere Pro PugetBench ( Export )2020 Premiere Pro PugetBench ( Live Playback )2020 Premiere Pro PugetBench ( GPU )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( Photo Effects )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( Face Detection )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( Offline Notes )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( Score )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( Stocks Dashboard )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( DNA Sequence Analysis )2020 CrXPRT 2 ( 3D Shapes )2020 DPC Latencies / LatencyMon ( interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Single-Core )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Multi-Core )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( OpenCL Score 5.1 )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Vulkan Score 5.1 )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Metal Score 5.1 )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Vulkan Score )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( Metal Score )2019 Geekbench 5.4 ( OpenCL Score )2019 AnTuTu v8 ( Total Score )2019 AnTuTu v8 ( CPU )2019 AnTuTu v8 ( GPU )2019 AnTuTu v8 ( UX )2019 AnTuTu v8 ( MEM )2019 V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 ( CPU )2019 V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 ( GPU )2019 Geekbench 5.0 ( 5.0 Single-Core )2019 Geekbench 5.0 ( 5.0 Multi-Core )2019 Geekbench 5.0 ( OpenCL Score 5.0 )2019 Geekbench 5.0 ( Metal Score 5.0 )2019 Geekbench 5.0 ( Vulkan Score 5.0 )2019 Unigine Superposition ( 720p Low 1280x720 )2019 Unigine Superposition ( 1080p High 1920x1080 )2019 Unigine Superposition ( 4k Optimized 3840x2160 )2019 Unigine Superposition ( 1080p Extreme 1920x1080 )2019 Unigine Superposition ( 8k Optimized 7680x4320 )2019 Cinebench R20 ( CPU (Multi Core) )2019 Cinebench R20 ( CPU (Single Core) )2018 DiskSpd ( seq q8 t1 read )2018 DiskSpd ( seq q8 t1 write )2018 DiskSpd ( seq read )2018 DiskSpd ( seq write )2018 DiskSpd ( 4k q32 t16 read )2018 DiskSpd ( 4k q32 t16 write )2018 DiskSpd ( 4k q1 t1 read )2018 DiskSpd ( 4k q1 t1 write )2018 DiskSpd ( loop seq q8 t1 read )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( Passmark Rating )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( CPU Mark )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( 2D Graphics Mark )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( 3D Graphics Mark )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( Memory Mark )2018 PassMark PerformanceTest 9 ( Disk Mark )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Vulkan Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Vulkan High Offscreen 3840x2160 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( OpenGL Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Metal Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( DX12 Simple Offscreen 1280x720 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Metal Medium Native )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Vulkan Medium Native )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( OpenGL Medium Native )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Vulkan Simple Offscreen 1280x720 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( OpenGL Simple Offscreen 1280x720 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( Metal High Offscreen 3840x2160 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( DX12 High Offscreen 3840x2160 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.2 ( DX12 Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.1 ( Vulkan Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.1 ( Vulkan High Offscreen 3840x2160 )2018 Basemark GPU 1.1 ( Vulkan Medium Native )2018 Basemark GPU 1.1 ( OpenGL Medium Offscreen 1920x1080 )2018 WebXPRT 32018 SPECviewperf 13 ( 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Catia (catia-05) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Creo (creo-02) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Energy (energy-02) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Maya (maya-05) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Medical (medical-02) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Showcase (showcase-02) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Siemens NX (snx-03) )2018 SPECviewperf 13 ( Solidworks (sw-04) )2017 AIDA64 ( Memory Copy )2017 AIDA64 ( Memory Latency )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU PhotoWorxx )2017 AIDA64 ( FPU VP8 )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU Hash )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU ZLib )2017 AIDA64 ( FP64 Ray-Trace )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU AES )2017 AIDA64 ( FPU Mandel )2017 AIDA64 ( FPU SinJulia )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU Queen )2017 AIDA64 ( FPU Julia )2017 AIDA64 ( FP32 Ray-Trace )2017 AIDA64 ( Memory Read )2017 AIDA64 ( Memory Write )2017 AIDA64 ( CPU SHA3 )2017 AIDA64 ( Report )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( 64 Bit Single-Core Score )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( 64 Bit Multi-Core Score )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( Compute OpenCL Score )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( Compute RenderScript Score )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( Compute Metal Score 4.1 )2017 Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 ( Compute Metal Score 4.4 )2017 AnTuTu v7 ( Total Score )2017 AnTuTu v7 ( CPU )2017 AnTuTu v7 ( GPU )2017 AnTuTu v7 ( UX )2017 AnTuTu v7 ( MEM )2016 VRMark ( Blue Room )2016 VRMark ( Orange Room )2016 VRMark ( Cyan Room )2016 VRMark ( Amber Room )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Read Seq Q32T1 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Write 4K Q8T8 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Write Seq Q32T1 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Read 4K Q8T8 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Read 4K Q32T1 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Write 4K Q32T1 )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Read Seq )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Write Seq )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Read 4K )2016 CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 ( Write 4K )2016 Geekbench 4.0 ( 64 Bit Multi-Core Score )2016 Geekbench 4.0 ( 64 Bit Single-Core Score )2016 Geekbench 4.0 ( Compute OpenCL Score )2016 Geekbench 4.0 ( Compute RenderScript Score )2015 AnTuTu v6 ( Total Score )2015 GFXBench ( Car Chase Offscreen 1920x1080 )2015 GFXBench ( Car Chase Onscreen on screen )2015 GFXBench ( Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080 )2015 GFXBench ( Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen on screen )2015 GFXBench ( Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen on screen )2015 GFXBench ( Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440 )2015 GFXBench ( 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3840x2160 )2015 SiSoft Sandra 2016 ( GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision) )2015 SiSoft Sandra 2016 ( GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512) )2015 SiSoft Sandra 2016 ( Image Processing )2015 WebXPRT 2015 ( Overall Score )2015 ANDEBench PRO 2015 ( Device Score )2015 ANDEBench PRO 2015 ( Storage )2015 ANDEBench PRO 2015 ( 3D )2015 ANDEBench PRO 2015 ( CoreMark-PRO (Base) )2015 GFXBench 3.1 ( Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen on screen )2015 GFXBench 3.1 ( Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen 1920x1080 )2015 Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal ( Overall Score offscreen )2014 AnTuTu v5 ( Total Score )2014 Vellamo 3.x ( Browser )2014 Vellamo 3.x ( Multicore Beta )2014 Vellamo 3.x ( Metal )2014 Lightmark ( 1080p 1920x1080 )2014 Basemark X 1.1 ( Medium Quality )2014 Basemark X 1.1 ( High Quality )2014 GFXBench 3.0 ( Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen )2014 GFXBench 3.0 ( 1080p Manhattan Offscreen 1920x1080 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 )2014 SPECviewperf 12 ( 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 )2014 BaseMark OS II ( Overall )2014 BaseMark OS II ( System )2014 BaseMark OS II ( Memory )2014 BaseMark OS II ( Graphics )2014 BaseMark OS II ( Web )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( Memory Bandwidth )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( Memory Latency )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( Storage )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( Platform )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( 3D )2014 ANDEBench PRO ( Device Score )2013 Octane V2 ( Total Score )2013 Geekbench 3 ( 32 Bit Multi-Core Score )2013 Geekbench 3 ( 32 Bit Single-Core Score )2013 Geekbench 3 ( 64 Bit Single-Core Score )2013 Geekbench 3 ( 64 Bit Multi-Core Score )2013 wPrime 2.10 ( 32m )2013 wPrime 2.10 ( 1024m )2013 Mozilla Kraken 1.1 ( Total Score )2013 Basemark X 1.0 ( On-Screen )2013 Basemark X 1.0 ( Off-Screen )2013 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 ( T-Rex Offscreen 1920x1080 )2013 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 ( T-Rex Onscreen )2013 Unigine Heaven 4.0 ( Extreme Preset DX11 )2013 Unigine Heaven 4.0 ( Extreme Preset OpenGL )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Standard Score 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Score 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Combined 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Extreme Score )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Extreme Graphics )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Extreme Physics )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Extreme Combined )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Extreme Score 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080 )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Unlimited Score 1280x720 offscreen )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen )2013 3DMark ( Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sky Diver Physics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Sky Diver Graphics 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Sky Diver Score 1280x720 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Ultra Score 3840x2160 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Ultra Graphics 3840x2160 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Ultra Physics 3840x2160 )2013 3DMark ( Fire Strike Ultra Combined 3840x2160 )2013 3DMark ( Time Spy Stress Test 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Time Spy Score 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Time Spy CPU 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sky Diver Stress Test )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Port Royal Graphics 2560x1440 )2013 3DMark ( Night Raid Score )2013 3DMark ( Night Raid Graphics Score )2013 3DMark ( Night Raid CPU Score )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Score )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Stress Test Stability )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Unlimited Score )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Extreme )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Extreme Stress Test )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Extreme Unlimited )2013 3DMark ( Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability )2013 3DMark ( Speed Way Score 2560x1440 )2013 Unigine Valley 1.0 ( Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080 x8 )2013 Unigine Valley 1.0 ( Extreme HD Preset OpenGL 1920x1080 x8 )2012 Vellamo Mobile Benchmark 2.0 ( Metal )2012 Vellamo Mobile Benchmark 2.0 ( HTML5 )2012 Mozilla Kraken 1.0 ( Total Score )2012 AnTuTu 3DRating2012 AnTuTu 3DRating ( Off-screen 1024x2048 )2012 AnTuTu 3DRating ( 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0 1024x2048 )2012 Octane V1 ( Total Score )2012 GLBenchmark 2.5 ( Egypt HD Fixed Time )2012 GLBenchmark 2.5 ( Egypt HD Offscreen Fixed Time 1920x1080 )2012 Unigine Heaven 3.0 ( DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080 Off )2012 Unigine Heaven 3.0 ( OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080 Off )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( System )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( CPU Tests )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( Memory Tests )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( 2D Graphics Tests )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( 3D Graphics Tests )2012 PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 ( Disk Tests )2012 LuxMark v2.0 64Bit ( Sala GPUs-only )2012 LuxMark v2.0 64Bit ( Room GPUs-only )2011 Blackmagic Disk Speed Test ( 5GB Write )2011 Blackmagic Disk Speed Test ( 5GB Read )2011 Basemark ES 2.0 ( Taiji Free )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Sequential Read 256KB )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Sequential Write 256KB )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Random Read 4KB )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Random Write 4KB )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Sequential Read 256KB SDCard )2011 AndroBench 3-5 ( Sequential Write 256KB SDCard )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Catia 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Ensight 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Lightwave 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Maya 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( SolidWorks 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Tcvis 1920x1080 )2011 SPECviewperf 11 ( Siemens NX 1920x1080 )2011 NenaMark22011 PCMark 7 ( Score )2011 PCMark 7 ( Lightweight )2011 PCMark 7 ( Productivity )2011 PCMark 7 ( Creativity )2011 PCMark 7 ( Entertainment )2011 PCMark 7 ( Computation )2011 PCMark 7 ( System Storage )2010 3DMark 11 ( Performance 1280x720 )2010 3DMark 11 ( Performance GPU 1280x720 )2010 3DMark 11 ( Performance Physics 1280x720 )2010 3DMark 11 ( Performance Combined 1280x720 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, Score 1024x600 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, Fluid 3DTex 1024x600 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr 1024x600 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, Mandel Vector 1024x600 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, Mandel Scalar 1024x600 )2010 ComputeMark v2.1 ( Normal, QJuliaRayTrace 1024x600 )2010 Unigine Heaven 2.1 ( high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024 off )2010 Cinebench R15 ( CPU Single 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R15 ( CPU Multi 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R15 ( OpenGL 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R15 ( Ref. Match 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( OpenGL 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( CPU Multi 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( CPU Single 64Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( OpenGL 32Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( CPU Multi 32Bit )2010 Cinebench R11.5 ( CPU Single 32Bit )2009 AS SSD ( Seq Read )2009 AS SSD ( Seq Write )2009 AS SSD ( 4K Read )2009 AS SSD ( 4K Write )2009 AS SSD ( 4K-64 Read )2009 AS SSD ( 4K-64 Write )2009 AS SSD ( Access Time Read )2009 AS SSD ( Access Time Write )2009 AS SSD ( Copy ISO MB/s )2009 AS SSD ( Copy Program MB/s )2009 AS SSD ( Copy Game MB/s )2009 AS SSD ( Score Read )2009 AS SSD ( Score Write )2009 AS SSD ( Score Total )2009 Peacekeeper2007 Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit ( Total Score )2007 Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit ( Integer )2007 Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit ( Floating Point )2007 Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit ( Memory )2007 Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit ( Stream )2007 Lightsmark ( 1280x1024 )2007 Lightsmark ( 1440x900 )2007 Lightsmark ( 1680x1050 )2007 Lightsmark ( 1920x1200 )2001 3DMark 2001SE ( Standard 1024x768 0x )Photoshop PugetBench ( Overall Score )Photoshop PugetBench ( General Score )Photoshop PugetBench ( GPU Score )Photoshop PugetBench ( Filter Score )PerfRatingPerfRatingPerfRatingPerfRatingPerfRatingMobileXPRT 2013 ( UX Tests )MobileXPRT 2013 ( Performance Tests )AndEBench ( Native )AndEBench ( Java )Epic Citadel ( High Performance )Epic Citadel ( High Quality )Epic Citadel ( Ultra High Quality )AnTuTu v4 ( Total Score )AnTuTu v3 ( Total Score )AnTuTu v3 ( GPU )AnTuTu v3 ( CPU )AnTuTu v3 ( I/O )AnTuTu v3 ( RAM )AnTuTu v2 ( Total Score )AnTuTu v2 ( RAM )AnTuTu v2 ( CPU Integer )AnTuTu v2 ( CPU Float-Point )AnTuTu v2 ( 2D Graphics )AnTuTu v2 ( 3D Graphics )AnTuTu v2 ( Database IO )AnTuTu v2 ( SD Card Write )AnTuTu v2 ( SD Card Read )Vellamo Mobile Web Benchmark 1.0.6 ( Overall Score )GLBenchmark 2.1 ( Egypt )GLBenchmark 2.1 ( Egypt Offscreen (720p) )GLBenchmark 2.1 ( Pro Offscreen (720p) )GLBenchmark 2.1 ( Pro )Quadrant 1.0Google V8 Ver. 7 ( Google V8 Ver. 7 Score )Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0Smartbench 2011 ( Productivity Index )Smartbench 2011 ( Games Index )Smartbench 2012 ( Productivity Index )Smartbench 2012 ( Gaming Index )Linpack Android / IOS ( Single Thread )Linpack Android / IOS ( Multi Thread )IOMeter ( IOMix, 5min, 10GB Partition )IOMeter ( Workstation, 3min, 10GB Partition )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 0.5KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 0.5KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 1KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 1KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 2KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 2KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 4KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 8KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 16KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 128KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 32KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 256KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 512KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 1024KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 2048KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 4KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 8KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 16KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 32KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 128KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 256KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 512KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 1024KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 2048KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 64KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 64KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 4096KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 8192KB read )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 4096KB write )ATTO Disk Benchmark ( 8192KB write )wPrime 1.55 ( 32m )wPrime 1.55 ( 1024m )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Read Seq )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Write Seq )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Read 512 )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Write 512 )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Read 4k )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Write 4k )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Read 4k QD32 )CrystalDiskMark 3.0 ( Write 4k QD32 )HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum ( Transfer Rate Minimum )HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum ( Transfer Rate Maximum )HD Tune Transfer Rate Average ( Transfer Rate Average )HD Tune Access Time ( Access Time )HD Tune Burst Rate ( Burst Rate )HD Tune CPU Utilization ( CPU Usage )3DMark Vantage ( P Result 1280x1024 )3DMark Vantage ( P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 )3DMark Vantage ( P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024 )3DMark Vantage ( E CPU no PhysX 1024x768 )3DMark Vantage ( E GPU no PhysX 1024x768 )3DMark Vantage ( E total no PhysX 1024x768 )3DMark 06 ( Standard Score 1280x1024 0x )3DMark 06 ( 1024x768 Score 1024x768 0x )3DMark 06 ( 1280x800 Score 1280x800 )3DMark 06 ( 1280x854 Score 1280X854 0x )3DMark 06 ( 1152x864 Score 1152x864 )3DMark 06 ( 1280x768 Score 1280x768 0x )3DMark 06 ( 1280x720 Score 1280x720 0x )3DMark 06 ( Score 1366x768 1366x768 )3DMark 06 ( Score Unknown Setting )3DMark 06 - CPU ( CPU Score )3DMark 05 ( Standard 1024x768 0x )PCMark Vantage ( Result 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( Memories Score 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( TV and Movies Score 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( Gaming Score 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( Music Score 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( Communications Score 1024x768 )PCMark Vantage ( Productivity Score 1024x

ips lcd display phones free sample

You Might Also Be Interested In