error code 0326 lcd panel price
I reconnected my screen and found that my screen was now dim. I ran the diagnostics program and found Error code 2000-0326 inverter unable to turn off.
201Order rejected - Reason:An attempted order was rejected by the IB servers. See Order Placement Considerations for additional information/considerations for these errors.
202Order cancelled - Reason:An active order on the IB server was cancelled. See Order Placement Considerations for additional information/considerations for these errors.
324Server error when reading a DDE client request (missing information).Make sure that you have specified all the needed information for your request.
341Invalid delta. Valid values are from 1 to 100. You can set the delta from the "Pegged to Stock" section of the Order Ticket Panel, or by selecting Page/Layout from the main menu and adding the Delta column.
425FA Order requires per-account manual allocations because there is no common clearing instruction. Please use order dialog Adviser tab to enter the allocation.This error is deprecated.
10231The following Groups and/or Profiles contain invalid accounts: If the account(s) inside Groups or Profiles is/are incorrect in xml-formatted configuration string of replaceFA request, then the error shows list of such Groups and/or Profiles.
10268The "EtradeOnly" order attribute is not supportedThe EtradeOnly IBApi.Order attribute is no longer supported. Error received with TWS versions 983+
10269The "firmQuoteOnly" order attribute is not supportedThe firmQuoteOnly IBApi.Order attribute is no longer supported. Error received with TWS versions 983+
10270The "nbboPriceCap" order attribute is not supportedThe nbboPriceCap IBApi.Order attribute is no longer supported. Error received with TWS versions 983+
IncludeMileRouteInformation, UnsaleableFares, AdditionalBookingCodeInfo for Primary/Secondary airline are mutually exclusive and cannot be requested together.
Required Terminal Session Info elements are missing.The required elements are: EAS UserID, EAS Password, PCC, ISOCountry, AgentDutyCode, AirLineVendorId, IATA, TerminalId
Required Terminal Session Info elements are missing. The required elements are: [Static GTID,TPFSYSID,PCC, Source ID, Source type, Vendor ID, Vendor type, Special Characters flag][EAS UserID, EAS Password, PCC, ISOCountry, AgentDutyCode, AirLineVendorId, IATA, TerminalId]
Different PseudoCityCode values sent in multiple AirPricingInfo without AirPricingInfoGroup or with same AirPricingInfoGroup values. PCC $? used to store fares.
Multiple AirPricingInfo without AirPricingInfoGroup or with same AirPricingInfoGroup values sent. PseudoCityCode value not sent in first AirPricingInfo. PCC $? used to store fares.
Required Session Context elements are missing.The required elements are: UserID, Password, PCC, ISOCountry, AgentDutyCode, AirLineVendorId, IATA, TerminalId, AgentSine
This error indicates that invalid credentials, the API Login ID or Transaction Key, are being submitted. If you have confirmed that your API login ID and Transaction Key are accurate, you may need to confirm that you are submitting to the correct URL. If you are using a test account, please make sure to post to the sandbox URL. If you’re using a live account, make sure to post to the production URL.
If all of these fields are duplicated in an existing subscription, error code E00012 will result. Modifying any of these fields should result in a unique subscription.
This error may occur for merchants on the HSBC or FDI Australia processors when setting validationMode to liveMode as these processors do not support authorization reversals. We recommend HSBC and FDI Australia merchants set validationMode to testMode instead.
The error message “Duplicate Transaction” indicates that a transaction request with the same information has been submitted within two minutes of a previous attempt. Authorize.Net looks for transactions which are likely to be duplicates by matching the data provided with the transaction.
This error indicates you are either posting the incorrect API Login ID within your script, connecting to a server that does not recognize your account, or using an account which is inactive. Please follow these steps to ensure that your software is connecting correctly:
If you are posting your transaction requests to the gateway URLs https://test.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll and you are using an account given to you by an Authorize.Net Reseller or from Authorize.Net Sales, you may encounter this error. The gateway URLs mentioned above only work with specific test accounts, available upon request by completing the form at https://developer.authorize.net/hello_world/sandbox/
Error 14 occurs for SIM users when one or more URLs are specified in your Default Response/Receipt URL settings, but we receive a URL with your transaction that does not match any listed here. In this case the transaction would include the field x_receipt_link_url if you prefer to view our receipt page but provide a link for the customer to use to return to your site. Alternately, the transaction would include the field x_relay_url to specify which web page on your server should be used as the receipt page your customers see.
By designating a Default Response/Receipt URL, you are telling our system to only return results to one of the listed URLs. If the value of either x_receipt_link_url or x_relay_url does not match one of these designated Default Response/Receipt URLs, Error 14 will occur.
This error may be caused by a refund request if the referenced transaction ID (refTransId) was originally processed through a different Authorize.Net account than the one being used for the refund request. Please submit refund transactions using the gateway account that generated the original transaction.
The error could also indicate a setup problem with a particular card type. Please contact your Merchant Service Provider (MSP) to check on your payment processing setup and to confirm that there are no issues with the configuration for the card type being submitted in the transaction.
This error message is displayed when there is a connection issue between Authorize.Net and the credit card processor. It results from Authorize.Net not receiving data in response to the transaction request we sent to the credit card processor. This type of issue is usually fixed quickly and we continue to work towards eliminating these types of connectivity issues. In some cases it may also be due to Internet congestion, and not related to either of our systems.
When a decline message appears for this card in Virtual Terminal, rather than the “Try again in 5 minutes” error message, this means the connectivity problem has been resolved and transactions can be processed again normally.
This error message is displayed when there is a connection issue between Authorize.Net and the credit card processor. It results from Authorize.Net not receiving data in response to the transaction request we sent to the credit card processor. This type of issue is usually fixed quickly and we continue to work towards eliminating these types of connectivity issues. In some cases it may also be due to Internet congestion, and not related to either of our systems.
When a decline message appears for this card in Virtual Terminal, rather than the “Try again in 5 minutes” error message, this means the connectivity problem has been resolved and transactions can be processed again normally.
1. This error may occur if you use the field currencyCode in your scripting, and you are setting it to a currency code other than what your account is set up for. Only one currency can be set for one account. At this time, Authorize.Net only supports the following currencies: AUD, CAD, CHF, DKK, EUR, GBP, NOK, NZD, PLN, SEK, USD, ZAR.
2. This error may occur when an Authorize.Net account is created without a valid Currency ID. In this situation, processing transactions is not possible through the API or through the Virtual Terminal, regardless of the currency you choose.
Only merchants set up for the FraudScreen.Net service would receive this decline. This code will be returned if a given transaction’s fraud score is higher than the threshold set by the merchant.
Regardless of the Card Code Verification filter settings configured for the payment gateway account in the Merchant Interface, the processor may decline transactions submitted with a card code value that does not match the card code on file for the cardholder at the issuing bank. To avoid unnecessary errors when processing live transactions, only valid card code values should be submitted in the card code field (cardCode). If the merchant does not wish to submit card code information, the card code field should not be submitted.
This error would be returned if the transaction received a code from the processor that matched the rejection criteria set by the merchant for both the AVS and Card Code filters.
When Authorize.Net is responding back to a script on your server, our system waits up to 10 seconds for a response. If we do not get a response in 10 seconds, our server will time out and display an error page. The first thing that you will need to look for is the order that your script executes. It is very important that something is printed to the screen before any other process is started. If your script prints to the screen first, we will recognize that you are receiving the information. The most effective method would be to print the headers, and a line of text such as “Processing, please wait.”
Please check to see if there are different processes that are used in your script for approvals, declines, or errors. Check each process to be sure that they will write to the screen before any other functions.
This error is caused when a transaction is submitted with data that the credit card processor does not recognize or is unable to interpret. In most cases our system will prevent this from happening with front-end safeguards, but since every processor is unique in the way they handle data, some transactions could get through to the processor with invalid or missing data. Examples of these types of discrepancies include placing the incorrect number of characters in the Card Verification Value (Card Code), or sending non-alphanumeric characters in the Zip Code.
If you receive an Error 63 repeatedly, please check that the Merchant Business country is set correctly. This is especially pertinent on accounts which use TSYS (formerly Vital or Visanet) as the payment processor, as we have to transmit a number of the Business Information fields on each Transaction attempt. TSYS/Vital/Visanet transactions will fail if all the information is not set correctly.
This error is applicable to Wells Fargo SecureSource merchants only. Credits or refunds cannot be issued against transactions that were not authorized.
The transaction was declined because the merchant configured their account through the Merchant Interface to reject transactions with certain values for a Card Code mismatch.
This error code is applicable to merchants using the Wells Fargo SecureSource product only. This product does not allow transactions of type CAPTURE_ONLY.
This error can occur for several possible reasons, depending on which method your software uses to connect to your Authorize.Net account. Usually it is due to mixing methods in unsupported ways.
1. When using AIM to integrate with Authorize.Net, the HTTP POST request must be made from a script located in a secure location on your server, and not through an HTML page. Submitting an AIM request from an unsecured HTML page may cause this error.
4. Also confirm that you are sending the field, x_relay_response, set to FALSE. Otherwise, we will attempt to use any default Relay Response or receipt links listed in your Response/Receipt URL settings in the Merchant Interface, which causes this error.
1. You will receive this error if there are variables being sent that are not applicable to SIM. Two of the variables that are most commonly incorrect include:
2. You will receive this error if the proper fingerprint hash variables are not being sent with the transaction request. The variables that need to be included (with appropriate values):
Applicable only to the SIM API. Fingerprints are only valid for a short period of time. This code indicates that the transaction fingerprint has expired.
If a customer fills in incorrect information and the transaction is declined, they cannot click Back and re-enter the information as this will attempt to use the same fingerprint hash in resubmitting the transaction request, which will result in error 98.
NOTE: This response is valid only for an integration method that has been sunset and is no longer available. If you encounter this error, please contact Merchant Support for assistance.
If you are receiving this error, it indicates that either x_password or x_tran_key is being submitted with your WebLink request. This represents a security risk as the password or transaction key could be viewed in your source code.
This error is generated when your account is in "Password-Required Mode" and you are not sending a valid password, transaction key or hash fingerprint with your transaction request, which is a recommended security measure.
If you are using a third party shopping cart which uses AIM and are receiving this error, please check with your shopping cart provider to ask if your application can pass the transaction key to the Authorize.Net payment gateway.
If you are using an older Authorize.Net account and you submit a password instead of a transaction key with your transactions, you may experience this error. Please ensure that you are posting a transaction key instead.
Some shopping carts, for backwards compatibility with older connection methods, may provide the means to submit both a transaction key and a password. You should not use both the transaction key and the password simultaneously; doing so may also result in this error. We recommend using the transaction key instead of the password whenever possible, as transaction keys tend to be more secure than passwords. In such a situation, please leave the password field blankIf the shopping cart has a field for the password but no field for the transaction key, please put the transaction key in the password field. Our system will recognize and validate the transaction key properly.
This code is applicable only to merchants that include the authenticationIndicator in the transaction request. The ECI value for a Visa transaction; or the UCAF indicator for a Mastercard transaction submitted in the authenticationIndicator field is invalid.
Also, this error can be received in the event that a special character is included in the cardholder authentication value. To resolve this issue, the special character must be URL encoded.
This code is applicable only to merchants that include the cardholderAuthenticationValue in the transaction request. The CAVV for a Visa transaction or the AVV/UCAF for a Mastercard transaction is invalid or contains an invalid character.
This code is applicable only to merchants that include the authenticationIndicator and cardholderAuthenticationValue in the transaction request. The combination of authenticationIndicator and cardholderAuthenticationValue is invalid.
This code is applicable only to merchants that include the authenticationIndicator and recurringBilling in the transaction request. Transactions submitted with a value in authenticationIndicator while recurringBilling is set to true will be rejected.
This error indicates that a user"s personal Login ID is being used to connect a website or billing software to the payment gateway. Personal login IDs may not be used to connect websites to Authorize.Net, for security reasons. For example, if an Account Owner, Account Administrator, Transaction Manager, or Account Analyst login ID is used for website or software implementation, this error will occur.
When merchants on the FDC Omaha platform encounter a decline due to AVS or CVV mismatch, we will attempt to void the transaction. If FDC Omaha does not reply to the void request, the merchant will see this error. As we did not receive a reply to the void request, there is a possibility that the original authorization will remain on the card for up to 30 days. If necessary, merchants may contact the card issuing bank, provide their merchant account number and the authorization code for the AVS/CVV declined transaction, and request a manual reversal of the authorization.
Transactions submitted from test credit card numbers (both ours and others") by merchants on the TSYS payment processing platform, will return a response of: "(180) An error occurred during processing. Please try again. Invalid processor response format," rather than "(2) Declined. This transaction has been declined."
Note that the TSYS payment processing platform was formerly known as Vital or Visanet. On TSYS/Vital/Visanet, Error 180 is an valid response indicating that a transaction was submitted and correctly received, but rejected due to using a test card number. If the processor is incorrectly configured, the response will be something more generic like a response of 30, 34, or 35.
This error also occurs if you submit a check number for your WEB, TEL, CCD, or PPD eCheck.Net transaction. Check numbers are only valid for ARC and BOC eCheck.Net transactions. See the eCheck.Net User Guide for details on eCheck.Net transaction types and requirements.
The SIM hosted payment form features a Security Code option (sometimes called CAPTCHA) used to confirm that the payment is being entered by a human being. This feature helps protect your site from automated scripts that may try to test credit card numbers through the payment form.
The Security Code works by generating an image that contains random numbers and letters that cannot be read by scripts. The customer is then prompted to enter the letters and numbers exactly as they appear in the image. If the customer enters the correct Security Code, the transaction is accepted as valid.
Error 312 indicates that the customer had entered the wrong Security Code. Should this error occur, a new Security Code is generated, and the customer is prompted to try again until they are successful.
Note: When using Simple Checkout, the customer is always required to verify a Security Code. Even if the Security Code is disabled from the payment form, the customer is required to verify a Security Code on the Simple Checkout order page.
The SIM hosted payment form features a Security Code option (sometimes called CAPTCHA) used to confirm that the payment is being entered by a human being. This feature helps protect your site from automated scripts that may try to test credit card numbers through the payment form.
The Security Code works by generating an image that contains random numbers and letters that cannot be read by scripts. The customer is then prompted to enter the letters and numbers exactly as they appear in the image. If the customer enters the correct Security Code, the transaction is accepted as valid.
Note: When using Simple Checkout, the customer is always required to verify a Security Code. Even if the Security Code is disabled from the payment form, the customer is required to verify a Security Code on the Simple Checkout order page.
NOTE: State and Postal Code are optional if the billing address is not in the U.S. or Canada. If the address is in the U.S. or Canada, the two-digit State/Province code must be provided, along with the Zip/Postal Code."
To evaluate the performance of display devices, several metrics are commonly used, such as response time, CR, color gamut, panel flexibility, viewing angle, resolution density, peak brightness, lifetime, among others. Here we compare LCD and OLED devices based on these metrics one by one.
The last finding is somehow counter to the intuition that a LCD should have a more severe motion picture image blur, as its response time is approximately 1000 × slower than that of an OLED (ms vs. μs). To validate this prediction, Chen et al.
If we want to further suppress image blur to an unnoticeable level (MPRT<2 ms), decreasing the duty ratio (for LCDs, this is the on-time ratio of the backlight, called scanning backlight or blinking backlight) is mostly adopted
To investigate the ACR, we have to clarify the reflectance first. A large TV is often operated by remote control, so touchscreen functionality is not required. As a result, an anti-reflection coating is commonly adopted. Let us assume that the reflectance is 1.2% for both LCD and OLED TVs. For the peak brightness and CR, different TV makers have their own specifications. Here, without losing generality, let us use the following brands as examples for comparison: LCD peak brightness=1200 nits, LCD CR=5000:1 (Sony 75″ X940E LCD TV); OLED peak brightness=600 nits, and OLED CR=infinity (Sony 77″ A1E OLED TV). The obtained ACR for both LCD and OLED TVs is plotted in Figure 7a. As expected, OLEDs have a much higher ACR in the low illuminance region (dark room) but drop sharply as ambient light gets brighter. At 63 lux, OLEDs have the same ACR as LCDs. Beyond 63 lux, LCDs take over. In many countries, 60 lux is the typical lighting condition in a family living room. This implies that LCDs have a higher ACR when the ambient light is brighter than 60 lux, such as in office lighting (320–500 lux) and a living room with the window shades or curtain open. Please note that, in our simulation, we used the real peak brightness of LCDs (1200 nits) and OLEDs (600 nits). In most cases, the displayed contents could vary from black to white. If we consider a typical 50% average picture level (i.e., 600 nits for LCDs vs. 300 nits for OLEDs), then the crossover point drops to 31 lux (not shown here), and LCDs are even more favorable. This is because the on-state brightness plays an important role to the ACR, as Equation (2) shows.
Calculated ACR as a function of different ambient light conditions for LCD and OLED TVs. Here we assume that the LCD peak brightness is 1200 nits and OLED peak brightness is 600 nits, with a surface reflectance of 1.2% for both the LCD and OLED. (a) LCD CR: 5000:1, OLED CR: infinity; (b) LCD CR: 20 000:1, OLED CR: infinity.
Recently, an LCD panel with an in-cell polarizer was proposed to decouple the depolarization effect of the LC layer and color filtersFigure 7b. Now, the crossover point takes place at 16 lux, which continues to favor LCDs.
For mobile displays, such as smartphones, touch functionality is required. Thus the outer surface is often subject to fingerprints, grease and other contaminants. Therefore, only a simple grade AR coating is used, and the total surface reflectance amounts to ~4.4%. Let us use the FFS LCD as an example for comparison with an OLED. The following parameters are used in our simulations: the LCD peak brightness is 600 nits and CR is 2000:1, while the OLED peak brightness is 500 nits and CR is infinity. Figure 8a depicts the calculated results, where the intersection occurs at 107 lux, which corresponds to a very dark overcast day. If the newly proposed structure with an in-cell polarizer is used, the FFS LCD could attain a 3000:1 CRFigure 8b), corresponding to an office building hallway or restroom lighting. For reference, a typical office light is in the range of 320–500 luxFigure 8 depicts, OLEDs have a superior ACR under dark ambient conditions, but this advantage gradually diminishes as the ambient light increases. This was indeed experimentally confirmed by LG Display
Calculated ACR as a function of different ambient light conditions for LCD and OLED smartphones. Reflectance is assumed to be 4.4% for both LCD and OLED. (a) LCD CR: 2000:1, OLED CR: infinity; (b) LCD CR: 3000:1, OLED CR: infinity. (LCD peak brightness: 600 nits; OLED peak brightness: 500 nits).
For conventional LCDs employing a WLED backlight, the yellow spectrum generated by YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) phosphor is too broad to become highly saturated RGB primary colors, as shown in Figure 9aTable 2. The first choice is the RG-phosphor-converted WLEDFigure 9b, the red and green emission spectra are well separated; still, the green spectrum (generated by β-sialon:Eu2+ phosphor) is fairly broad and red spectrum (generated by K2SiF6:Mn4+ (potassium silicofluoride, KSF) phosphor) is not deep enough, leading to 70%–80% Rec. 2020, depending on the color filters used.
Recently, a new LED technology, called the Vivid Color LED, was demonstratedFigure 9d), which leads to an unprecedented color gamut (~98% Rec. 2020) together with specially designed color filters. Such a color gamut is comparable to that of laser-lit displays but without laser speckles. Moreover, the Vivid Color LED is heavy-metal free and shows good thermal stability. If the efficiency and cost can be further improved, it would be a perfect candidate for an LCD backlight.
A color filter array is another effective approach to enhance the color gamut of an OLED. For example, in 2017, AUO demonstrated a 5-inch top-emission OLED panel with 95% Rec. 2020. In this design, so-called symmetric panel stacking with a color filter is employed to generate purer RGB primary colors
As mentioned earlier, TFT LCDs are a fairly mature technology. They can be operated for >10 years without noticeable performance degradation. However, OLEDs are more sensitive to moisture and oxygen than LCDs. Thus their lifetime, especially for blue OLEDs, is still an issue. For mobile displays, this is not a critical issue because the expected usage of a smartphone is approximately 2–3 years. However, for large TVs, a lifetime of >30 000 h (>10 years) has become the normal expectation for consumers.
Power consumption is equally important as other metrics. For LCDs, power consumption consists of two parts: the backlight and driving electronics. The ratio between these two depends on the display size and resolution density. For a 55″ 4K LCD TV, the backlight occupies approximately 90% of the total power consumption. To make full use of the backlight, a dual brightness enhancement film is commonly embedded to recycle mismatched polarized light
The power efficiency of an OLED is generally limited by the extraction efficiency (ηext~20%). To improve the power efficiency, multiple approaches can be used, such as a microlens array, a corrugated structure with a high refractive index substrateFigure 11 shows the power efficiencies of white, green, red and blue phosphorescent as well as blue fluorescent/TTF OLEDs over time. For OLEDs with fluorescent emitters in the 1980s and 1990s, the power efficiency was limited by the IQE, typically <10 lm W−1(Refs. 41, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118). With the incorporation of phosphorescent emitters in the ~2000 s, the power efficiency was significantly improved owing to the materials and device engineering−1 was demonstrated in 2011 (Ref. 127), which showed a >100 × improvement compared with that of the basic two-layer device proposed in 1987 (1.5 lm W−1 in Ref. 41). A white OLED with a power efficiency >100 lm W−1 was also demonstrated, which was comparable to the power efficiency of a LCD backlight. For red and blue OLEDs, their power efficiencies are generally lower than that of the green OLED due to their lower photopic sensitivity function, and there is a tradeoff between color saturation and power efficiency. Note, we separated the performances of blue phosphorescent and fluorescent/TTF OLEDs. For the blue phosphorescent OLEDs, although the power efficiency can be as high as ~80 lm W−1, the operation lifetime is short and color is sky-blue. For display applications, the blue TTF OLED is the favored choice, with an acceptable lifetime and color but a much lower power efficiency (16 lm W−1) than its phosphorescent counterpartFigure 11 shows.
To compare the power consumption of LCDs and OLEDs with the same resolution density, the displayed contents should be considered as well. In general, OLEDs are more efficient than LCDs for displaying dark images because black pixels consume little power for an emissive display, while LCDs are more efficient than OLEDs at displaying bright images. Currently, a ~65% average picture level is the intersection point between RGB OLEDs and LCDs
In addition to the aforementioned six display metrics, other parameters are equally important. For example, high-resolution density has become a standard for all high-end display devices. Currently, LCD is taking the lead in consumer electronic products. Eight-hundred ppi or even >1000 ppi LCDs have already been demonstrated and commercialized, such as in the Sony 5.5″ 4k Smartphone Xperia Z5 Premium. The resolution of RGB OLEDs is limited by the physical dimension of the fine-pitch shadow mask. To compete with LCDs, most OLED displays use the PenTile RGB subpixel matrix scheme
The viewing angle is another important property that defines the viewing experience at large oblique angles, which is quite critical for multi-viewer applications. OLEDs are self-emissive and have an angular distribution that is much broader than that of LCDs. For instance, at a 30° viewing angle, the OLED brightness only decreases by 30%, whereas the LCD brightness decrease exceeds 50%. To widen an LCD’s viewing angle, three options can be used. (1) Remove the brightness-enhancement film in the backlight system. The tradeoff is decreased on-axis brightness
In addition to brightness, color, grayscale and the CR also vary with the viewing angle, known as color shift and gamma shift. In these aspects, LCDs and OLEDs have different mechanisms. For LCDs, they are induced by the anisotropic property of the LC material, which could be compensated for with uniaxial or biaxial films
Cost is another key factor for consumers. LCDs have been the topic of extensive investigation and investment, whereas OLED technology is emerging and its fabrication yield and capability are still far behind LCDs. As a result, the price of OLEDs is about twice as high as that of LCDs, especially for large displays. As more investment is made in OLEDs and more advanced fabrication technology is developed, such as ink-jet printing
A generation that was expected to be in %s.dbo.MSmerge_genhistory could not be found. If this error occurred in a subscription database, reinitialize the subscription. If this error occurred in a publication database, restore the database from a backup.
The schema change failed during execution of an internal replication procedure. For corrective action, see the other error messages that accompany this error message.
Merge data definition language (DDL) error: Dropping a column used in a row filter or a join filter is not allowed. To drop a column used in a row filter, first change the row filter using sp_changemergearticle. To drop a column used in a join filter, first drop the join filter using sp_dropmergefilter.
The article %s in the publication %s does not have a valid conflict table entry in the system table sysarticleupdates. This entry is required for publications that allow queued updating subscriptions. Check for errors in the last run of the Snapshot Agent.
Unable to run SQL*PLUS. Make certain that a current version of the Oracle client code is installed at the distributor. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21617 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
The version of SQL*PLUS that is accessible through the system Path variable is not current enough to support Oracle publishing. Make certain that a current version of the Oracle client code is installed at the distributor. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21620 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
Unable to locate the registered Oracle OLEDB provider, OraOLEDB.Oracle, at distributor "%s". Make certain that a current version of the Oracle OLEDB provider is installed and registered at the distributor. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21624 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
Unable to connect to Oracle database server "%s" using the Oracle OLEDB provider OraOLEDB.Oracle. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21626 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
Unable to connect to Oracle database server "%s" using the Microsoft OLEDB provider MSDAORA. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21627 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
Unable to update the registry of distributor "%s" to allow Oracle OLEDB provider OraOLEDB.Oracle to run in process with SQL Server. Make certain that current login is authorized to modify SQL Server owned registry keys. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21628 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
The CLSID registry key indicating that the Oracle OLEDB Provider for Oracle, OraOLEDB.Oracle, has been registered is not present at the distributor. Make certain that the Oracle OLEDB provider is installed and registered at the distributor. For addition information, see SQL Server Error 21629 in Troubleshooting Oracle Publishers in SQL Server Books Online.
Failed to execute the HREPL.%s request to Oracle Publisher "%s". Verify that the Oracle package code exists on the Publisher, and that the replication administrative user account has sufficient permissions.
Unable to relocate the article log table to a different tablespace. Verify that the replication administrative user login can connect to the Oracle Publisher using SQL*PLUS. If you can connect, but the problem persists, it might be caused by insufficient permissions or insufficient space in the tablespace; check for any Oracle error messages.
Cannot execute the replication script; the current session will be terminated. Check for any errors returned by SQL Server during execution of the script.
Custom data type mappings are not supported. You must validate the correctness of the mapping. If mappings are not compatible, errors will likely occur when moving data from the Publisher to the Subscriber.
The distribution database "%s" cannot be opened due to inaccessible files. The database will be dropped, but distribution database cleanup tasks will not occur. Check the database and server error logs for more information about why the database files cannot be accessed.
Cannot add primary key column "%s" to article "%s". If the Publisher is a non-SQL Server Publisher, the primary key could have violated SQL Server limits for number and length of columns. For more information, see errors returned by sp_addarticle.
The stored procedure sp_createagentparameter failed to add one or more parameters to the system table msdb.dbo.MSagentparameterlist. Check for any errors returned by sp_createagentparameter and errors returned by SQL Server during execution of sp_createagentparameter.
Cannot update agent parameter metadata. Replication could not insert parameter "%s" into table "%s". Verify that replication is properly installed. Check errors returned by SQL Server during execution of sp_createagentparameter.
Unable to query the redirected server "%s" for original publisher "%s" and publisher database "%s" to determine the name of the remote server; Error %d, Error message "%s".
Unable to query sys.availability_replicas at the availability group primary associated with virtual network name "%s" for the server names of the member replicas: error = %d, error message = %s."
The query at the redirected publisher "%s" to determine whether there were sysserver entries for the subscribers of the original publisher "%s" failed with error "%d", error message "%s".
1. This is a soft error (warning) which can be bypassed by sending another End Transaction API call (Passenger Details can be used as well). Please ensure that you do not specify the
2. Please consider using either Passenger Details or Create Passenger Name Record (SOAP | REST) APIs in your workflow as these soft errors are handled automatically by these services.
1. This is a soft error (warning) which can be bypassed by sending a Send Sabre Command API call with
2. Please consider using either Passenger Details or Create Passenger Name Record (SOAP | REST) APIs in your workflow as these soft errors are handled automatically by these services.
This response occurs when you attempt to store a passenger type code in the PNR and you do not have the "Store Passenger Type In PNR" active in your PCC/TJR.
This error is returned when the data in the offer contains a codeshare flight. At least one flight segment in the selected offer that has a carrier code not listed on the NDC Airline Profile table, hence the message “Profile not found”.
{\"category\":\"ERR.PNRDS.CLIENT.VALIDATION_FAILED\",\"message\":\"Message validation failed. Errors: [cvc-complex-type.2.4.b: The content of element "LocatorWithDate" is not complete. One of "{createDate}" is expected.]\",\"status\":\"NotProcessed\",\"type\":\"Validation\",\"source\":\"CLIENT\"}
It is recommended that you design your client code to look for system errors first, then provide error handling, and finally examine the data returned in the response. By first ensuring that errors are not returned, the problem of trying to parse an error instead of response data is avoided.
When you capture
Ms.Josey 
Ms.Josey