lenovo y50-70 touch lcd panel in stock

The IBM-Lenovo Y50-70 TOUCH SERIES replacement screen uses a color active matrix TFT (Thin Film Transistor) liquid crystal display (LCD) that uses amorphous silicon TFTs as switching components. This IBM-Lenovo Y50-70 TOUCH SERIES replacement panel is composed of a TFT LCD panel, a driver circuit, and a backlight unit. This IBM-Lenovo Y50-70 TOUCH SERIES replacement LED Screen can display up to 262,144 colors.

LAPTOPPANEL.com.auonly sell Genuine, High-qualitylaptop panels made by well-known manufacturers. All laptop models use the same types of panels as the ones we supply so they are 100% compatible with all laptop models. There are no fake or generic panels on the market because they cost a lot to make and they’re not easy to manufacture. Subsequently, only large corporations have the ability to manufacture LCD panels. These include AUO, Chi-Mei, Toshiba, Hannstar, Chunghwa, Samsung, LG Philips, Sharp, Hydis Hyundai, etc. They are also well-known suppliers of other electronic components.

* Please note,we will provide a screen that is compatible to the model you request. Often, the model that is compatible may have a different model number to the original panel number.

lenovo y50-70 touch lcd panel in stock

Ghost Touch, Running Touch, No-Touch, and Inverted Touch are not screen related issues. Kindly check your digitizer board and cable since they are the most likely cause of any touch issue; please do not open a return claiming the touch did not work. If the machine has a weakened or fragile digitizer board, the replacement unit or assembly will not have proper touch or in some cases it may not have touch at all. The order is not processed unless requested information has been received.

N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430

B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5D10G85620 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 Lenovo 5T50G99217 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 AP14R000200

There are two different resolutions used in Lenovo Y50-70 Models. Listed Touch Screen Assembly comes with Full HD 1920 X 1080 resolution . B156HTN03.6 and N156HGE-EA1 are common FULL HD screen part numbers, listed assembly will work for. It is not compatible to 4K 3840 X 2160 LTN156FL02 touch assembly. 3840x2160 UHD and Listed Product is not going to work for that resolution. Again , 4K 3840 X 2160 LTN156FL02 Touch assembly for Lenovo Y50-70 is expensive product and this listing does not represent that.

lenovo y50-70 touch lcd panel in stock

Laptop-LCD-Screen.co.uk guarantee you a working Ibm Lenovo Y50 70 59441814 screen replacement, or your money back. With our 16 years of trading experience, we can warrant that claim with real expertise. If you research our company, you will encounter our impressive accumulation of fantastic reviews on sites like Trustpilot and Google.

Touch screen computers have two parts to the viewable display. They have a screen, like any computer and in addition they have another layer over the top of the screen that works like a mouse. That 2nd part is called a touch glass digitizer, and we aren"t supplying that, we"re selling just the LCD screen. In some cases you can re-use the old digitizer, unless of course it is damaged. If your old digitiser is damaged, this product is not for you. If your computer is not a touch screen model, you can go ahead and use this product with no problems. More about this...

Lenovo Screens can be manufactured in MATTE or GLOSSY finish. MATTE is better for outdoor use and GLOSS is better for indoor use. GLOSS screens will display brighter and richer colours, and MATTE screens will look duller, but are less reflective. We try where possible to offer both options, if we have both options, we will offer them in the product description. More about this...

We insist on higher grade Class I panels, (note that there is no such thing as a Grade A screen). We pay a little more to ensure our products impress and please every time, and give a long working lifetime. With more than a decade of experience our team will ensure your high quality replacement screen is as good - or better than your original display, and that the whole process from purchase, through the delivery and to installation, is seamless. And this promise is endorsed by our customers.

lenovo y50-70 touch lcd panel in stock

The agony of choice. After our first review of the FHD version of the new Lenovo Y50 Gaming notebook, we are now focusing on a version with UHD display (3840x2160 pixels) and fast Samsung SSD. Full HD and matte or ultra HD and glossy? That"s the question. We compare both displays.

The Lenovo Y50 is one of the most interesting products in the 2014 portfolio of the Chinese hardware giant. The device is explicitly advertised as a gaming notebook, even though its design (15.6-inch, 4 kilograms, 24 millimeters height) and equipment (Intel Core i7-4710HQ, Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M, SSD) would allow it to be part of the high-performance multimedia segment. Probably it"s exactly this balancing act that makes the device interesting for a large clientele. A lot of performance in a smart and mobile chassis at an attractive price. Sounds like a clear victory, there is, however, a catch...

In our first test of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70we went through a configuration for the US market, equipped with a Full HD display as offered in many shops in Germany. Our conclusion: great package, but disappointing display with low brightness and contrast, not to mention the poor color accuracy and the limited viewing angles. Looking at the aggressive entry level price of only 899 Euros, ~$1181 (i5-4200M, 860M), we immediately find the explanation for that extremely bad panel.

Starting from 1399 Euros, ~$1838 (1199 Euros, ~$1575, without operating system), the UHD display we are focusing on with a resolution of 3840x2160 pixelsis used. The large price difference to the entry-level configuration is explained by the Intel i7-4710HQ quad-core CPU and a 512 GB SSD. In the following review we are dealing with the differences to the already tested version. Further information on the identically constructed chassis can be retrieved from the existing test of the Lenovo Y50-70 with FHD display.

Contrary to the first tested version of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50, which is equipped with an Intel wireless AC3160, the top configuration for the German market is equipped with an Atheros module(AR9565 b/g/n). We performed a comparative test with three other devices.

An essential point of criticism of the alternative FHD display of the Y50 was its poor brightness. With a maximum of 237 cd/m2 it was only insignificantly higher than required for an entry-level notebook. The UHD panel already improved in this point. We measure a maximum of 290 cd/m2 in the central area at an average brightness of 257 Candela. The drop toward the edges, which is clearly visible in the diagram, results in an illumination of just 80%. In practice, however, no impairments could be observed. Only in a completely dark room with pure black background, a translucency of the background illumination (screen bleeding) could be observed in the upper right corner.

Choosing the right display is made even more difficult by the different panels that are available for the FHD version. Next to the already tested CMN15C4 (Chi Mei N1156HGE-EAB), an AU Optronics (AUO36ED) panel is used which our Polish colleagues found in their test of the Y50. With a brightness of 234 Candela on average and a contrast of only 275:1, it is still on a comparably bad level as the Chi-Mei alternative. On its homepage, Lenovo states that the UHD display is a touch display. However, the version that we tested (59424712) does not show any touch functionality.

Black level of 0.51 cd/m2 is lower than for the FHD panel; together with the higher brightness this increases the maximum picture contrast significantly: with 566:1 the display is only mid-table and there is still room for improvements to the (considerably more expensive) top class (MacBook Pro 15 Retina: 998:1, Dell XPS 15: 1.662:1).

Outdoor use is determined by a combination of display brightness and surface. The FHD display of the already tested Y50 was equipped with a matte panel, whereas the current UHD version has a glossy surface. In terms of brightness, the FHD display achieves 221 cd/m2 on average and brightness reduces by 40 Candela when running on battery only, whereas the glossy UHD panel reaches a higher value of 257 cd/m2 which is still available when running on battery only.

A last significant difference of the two available display types is the viewing angle. The FH panel relies on TN technology; in the case of the UHD display, an IPS panel is used according to numerous data sheets of different shops. Respectively, large differences in possible viewing angles result: where impairments of the viewing angle can be noted for the Lenovo Y50 with FHD panel, the UHD display also remains stable for flatter viewing angles. In extreme positions, a slight wash-out of the represented image can be observed; atypical for an IPS panel. In this case, annoying reflections show up more.

In direct comparison i7-4700HQ vs. 4710HQ, the latter features a greater 100 MHz base(2.4 vs. 2.5 GHz) and maximum turbo clock rate (3.4 vs. 3.5 GHz). The Cinebench benchmark comparison clearly shows this. Our available test device outperforms our first test configuration by 3-7%. Also interesting is the comparison to the alternatively offeredIntelCPU of the Lenovo Y50-70, a standard voltage dual-core chip. Due to a high turbo it can perform the single-thread test on a comparable level as its quad-core colleagues. Only in the multi-core test the processor drops behind.Since GPU performance is first and foremost still limiting for most games, the offered dual-core CPU would be even capable of maxing out the GTX 860M in many current games.

In comparison to other devices with similar CPU, the Cinebench Multi-core Rendering test reveals that full potential of the CPU is not entirely used (minus 15-30%). In a matter of seconds, clock speeds are limited to 2.5 GHz (basis clock pulse). That happens independently of the chip temperature and is most likely set by Lenovo in order to keep the exhaust heat of the CPU within reasonable ranges. The single-core test is very well performed; clock speeds are between 3.3 and 3.5 GHz.

Results of PCMark 7 are impressive, which is mainly due to the use of an SSD. The configuration we tested with minimally fast CPU and fast SSD exceeds the results of the Y50-70 version with an already enhanced SSHD.

Starting from 1299 Euros (~$1707), the Lenovo Ideapad Y50-70 can be purchased with the integrated 512 GB SSD; a 256 GB drive version starts from 999 Euros (~$1312). Given the expected high memory requirements of games, we would advise to go for the larger storage volume.

The Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP SSDthat is implemented into our test modelcosts around 250 Euros (~$328) as a single component. Those considering an upgrade should take this into account. According to Lenovo"s

Under load, the currently tested IdeaPad Y50-70 behaves identically to the other version, which comes as no surprise, considering the approximately same core components. In 3DMark06 we measured a noise level of 38.6 to 42.3 dB(A) (dark green curve), which can be described as a rather low-frequent, but not really annoying, whooshing. In the stress test, the used fans (one for CPU and one for GPU) turn faster and an increase in higher frequencies can be noticed.

That theIdeaPad Y50-70 heats up under load was already shown by the first test we performed on the other version. Overall, the observed characteristics of the temperature development at the surfaces are very similar for the current test model; however, even slightly higher peak temperatures of over 60 °C could be measured at the bottom of the device.

The speakers that are used for the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 are not only subjectively good; frequency analysisalsoshows good coverage of a broad frequency band, from deep to high tones. The three graphs show the behavior at 25, 50 and 100% volume. The measured maximum volume was 76 dB/ 41 sone (white noise) or 78 dB/ 45 sone (pink noise).

Let"s get down to the conclusion. In the beginning we asked ourselves which of the two offered Lenovo IdeaPad Y50display versions is the better one. After having performed this review update, we arrive at the following conclusion:

In the case of the current Y50-70 we would tend to go for theUHD version. This decision relies, however, on the fact that we had to choose the lesser evil, not on the fact that the UHD display of the test device convinced us. The slightly better brightness, the improved color representation as well as the high resolution that offers at least advantages in terms of office use - even though there might not be any advantages in terms of gaming - compensate for the disadvantage of a glossy display surface, especially if the device is used indoors.

Overall, it is a pity that Lenovo - since it already offers different display versions - does not have an optional, high-end panel solution in order to keep its competitors under control. With the current components many potential customers will probably wave it aside. The UHD display tries to hide its modest measured values behind the general resolution hype.