tft display canon 6d factory

Hello everyone, i am here for requesting a serious help through my first post in this forum. I bought a used 6D camera six months ago. There is no problem for the camera till the last week, but now the display is not turn on when camera starting. There is complete black screen without any backlight. After some minutes display working correctly. It happens each time of startup and after standby. All other functions are working finely. I can shoot even if the display is not working. Anybody please help about the issue

My camera display does not light up when I turn on power because it is set that way. However, I do get the brief "sensor cleanig" messsage at startup, which is enabled as a factory default. If that were disabled, then I would not even see that.

After "some minutes" what is the first thing that you see? Do you have to press any buttons, like [INFO] or [Q]? If you do not press any buttons does the display come to life?

Hi, Sent my 1D2N in for sensor cleaning ( never cleaned a sensor before so I prefer to make my first attempt on a less expensive camera ) and for calibration with my 100-400mmL. Both came back in a timely fashion but when I checked out my 1D2N I found a deep nick in the Quick Control Dial and after further inspection I find two (2) dings on the body above the Canon name just in front of the Hot Shoe. All this on a camera less than 4 months old that I have babied and that was mint except for a faint scratch on the LCD and I mean a faint scratch barely noticable.

I immediately called Canon FS and was told I would received an RMA in a few days to return my camera again to CFS for repair. The RMA came and I sent my camera back to Canon once more.

This time I check the camera closely and I"m thinking this camera looks to be new yet the serial number is mine. Finally I look at the paperwork and see that they have replaced the top cover, back cover unit and TFT (LCD ), WOW.

I owned this camera from about 2014-2018 and always enjoyed it. Just picked up another 6D for a song. Even owning much "higher spec" Canon bodies, I"m happy to have this little gem back in my rotation. Still a pleasure to use and the image quality holds up well. This camera"s simplicity is now part of its charm. No fuss, no frills, basic but accurate AF. Just shoot. And it still delivers.

I had never given the 6D much attention until a friend lent me one when my 1Ds mark ii failed. The low weight was very welcome, as was the ability to get usable images at ISO 12800. Only the lack of a second card slot bothered me, and then not very much. In fact some of the so-called disadvantages are, to me, advantages!

I liked how comfortable a 6D is to hold, It made1D series bodies seem uncomfortable due to the front-facing protrusion from the battery chamber. It is there for the vertical grip, but it makes landscape format awkward. I had used 1D-series cameras for years and never noticed (or had forgotten) until I used the 6D how much more comfortable a more conventional camera can be.

I might just buy one. The only thing that worries me is that a 6D would not survive getting knocked or soaked. My 1D series cameras just carried on working no matter what. Some of the bumps my 1D ii N and 1Ds ii took, or the rain they survived, would have killed a 6D.

WiFi is very useful so that it can be operated on DSLR Controller on my phone (the canon app has gotten better over the last few releases, but still not great).

2 - No face detection. Given this camera is not a "budget" camera, I just can"t believe that it doesn"t have face detection. Face detection is a wonderful feature and is now included with most decent cameras. My $150 point-and-shoot has face detection, but the Canon people weren"t able to build it into the 6D.

Both of you aren"t using the 6D right. The center AF point is the best AF point for low light that Canon has ever produced in a DSLR. There"s no way the 70D focuses better than the 6D, and I have both (in fact I have most of Canon"s DSLR"s). Let"s keep facts facts and opinions opinions please.

3Percent: Uhhh, excuse me, but where did you read in my comment that I said I do NOT use the center AF point for focusing with the 6d? You wrote, "Both of you aren"t using the 6d right." To quote YOU again, "Let"s keep facts facts and opinions opinions please." Get YOUR facts straight before you comment.

My dear friends, I used both the bodies. My first cam was 70D, which was absolutely stunning for it"s day light photography and videography due to it"s dual pixel AF capability. On d other hand, 6D, which um currently using, is a solid piece for low light photography. In fact its a low light king! Although it"s equipped with only 11 AF points, but its Centre point AF density in low light in extreme. I tested in many circumstances, I still love it! <3

I was planning to upgrade my 5DII to this because of the Wi-Fi and GPS feature but I"ve heard an upgrade is in the works so I"ll hold out a bit more. I have a Nikon P900 with Wi-Fi and GPS and the GPS helps greatly where the picture was taken. If it"s going to be long for the upgraded 6DII Canon"s refurbished prices are mighty tempting for the 6D

I upgraded from a T3i to the 6D a few months ago. There is only one issue with the 6D - every image is in focus. Instead of coming home with 600 images and quickly weeding out 1/3 of them because they were not sharp or low light resulted in images that were too noisy, I"m now weeding out 1 or 2 percent, and almost always because of my error, not the camera"s. Picking out the images I want to keep and process takes a LOT longer.

After reading the latest review http://www.dpreview.com/articles/2436252004/bsi-boss-sony-alpha-7r-ii-added-to-studio-scene some of the commentators there pointed out that the Canon 6D is excellent low light (high ISO) even when compared against the other (much) more expensive FF cameras. It"s very puzzling how on Earth the reviewers gave silver to this excellent camera? I am Sony fanboy but the comparision tool has shown me that the Canon 6D high-ISO images are better than the Sony"s. Surprising and very informative: there must be a catch or an error. Maybe Canon ISO"s are faked just like Fujifilm"s?

Miki Nemeth. Its right. Images from 6D are better then even any cameras on market still now. Noises are just very little more then noise from Nikon DF, just a little. Colors are best on market, especially at ISO6400. Camera is light, can focus in low light, has gps and wifi, cost much less then modern 4/3 sensor (!!!) cameras, lenses are so many... What photographer want for work more then this?

I have owned a the EOS 6d for around 4 months now and overall I find it to be a great camera. Image quality is top notch even in low light. What canon has done here is allowed people to fully exploit the full range of canon lenses and accessories in a way that was not really achievable with an APSc sized sensor.

Economy is not achieved by hobbling the video, autofocus, HDR and other features as Canon has done. I feel as if Canon punished me for not buying the more expensive rig!

Having taken my licks, it"s time for some fresh air. With Sony, so far, so good. Video is definitely pro quality. It does everything well. Native 16:9 delivers the same size image as a 6D and is nearly a 2X panorama. Image quality is sumptuous at 24 MP and the kit lens, contrary to my expectations, delivers excellent contrast, color, and resolution.

Using a Metabones adapter (fairly expensive) my Canon EF lenses are all image stabilized by the body. I can also use my old FD lenses, including an FD 300mm f/2.8L lens, and Sony is on the right track with clear 2X zoom, which is more than a sales feature--it draws on CPU power to interpolate pixels by unique algorithms.

Is the AF on the A7 faster than the 6D? I have the 7D and am considering the 6D for improved AF speed. I don"t need multiple AF points or tracking, just one, quick, central point. I was under the impression the 6D had this...

TallTommy, re AF: The Canon 6D is quicker than the Sony A7ii, but i doubt if it"d be quicker than the already fast-focusing Canon 7D. Among Sonys, fastest still is the A6000.

Chances are the new 7D2 would beat all those cameras at AF speed, and it is able to AF in very low light as well. And not just AF speed but tracking as well. Canon is not "punishing" anyone for not spending more than the entry level model costs any more than Toyota "punishes" you for buying a Corolla instead of an Avalon. If the Corolla isn"t good enough for the money, you find something else that is.

I own both a 6D and a a7. Although the a7 has a really nice sensor the 6D"s autofocus especially the central one is very snappy, consistent, and faster than the a7 in my experience. Not sure if the 6D is faster than the 7D.

I think the 6D is a little faster for focusing, generally an advantage of SLRs. One virtue of the Sony A7II is 5 axis stabilization in the body, and I think you get 3 axis stabilization with 3rd party lenses.

My old Canon FD 300mm f/2.8L works beautifully with A7II, but an adapter for Canon FD-->Canon EF costs a thousand dollars, has no IS and crops the field. Sony 2x "clear image zoom" works very well in spite of negative reviews, if you"re using a high quality lens.

I use a 50D for my high school sports work but wanted a full frame for portraiture. I purchased the 6d and am happy with it but can"t seem to figure out how to get to the low ISO"s (100 & 50). I set the ISO range to 50-1600 in the menu but the lowest ISO I can select still only goes to 200. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Basically upgrading my 60D. I can only afford the 7D Mii or 6D. I know they are completely different but, for a more all around use.....does one beat out the other?

As far as sports go I would say the 6D lacks the burst rate needed for most action sports. I have both the 6D and the 50D and shoot mainly high school and college sports with the 50D because of the faster continuous burst speed. However I have used the 6d with success in lower light situations such as night football, indoor basketball (where flash is not permitted). I have had good results with both cameras but prefer the 6D more for portraits and weddings it"s a great camera (IMHO)

I found your comments interesting. I am seriously interested in buying the 6D but I am concerned about reports of AF deficiencies. Probably 40% of my shots are of action sports. I currently have a 60D with a maximum burst rate of 5.3 that I rarely use (generally opt for "low speed continuous). Therefore, 4.5 fps sounds reasonable to me. Any comments you may have about any problems caused by the AI system on your 6D in the gym or night football would be very much appreciated. I would also appreciate comments from any other users who have something to offer on this topic.

It"s a shame too, because the body itself is great and easy to use. And wow, the iso performance is utterly spectacular. I took this body to japan last year, and while it did well overall, the 6d hates my 24-105. I landed many usable photos, but just off in the focus in too many basic situations. I was sad that the IS didnt help more, and I dont exactly have shaky hands.

Most of the issues with the 6D, of course, could be addressed via a firmware update. A firmware update that will never come. Hey, Canon is not Samsung, it"s more like Apple... They don"t care what the customer wants / thinks.

For the skeptics and the nitpickers on the 6ds" video capabilities, check that video out. By far one of the best wedding videos i"ve come across. Most of the couple moments were taken with the Canon 85mm F1.2 ($2k lense) and the chapel moments were taken with the 70d(2:29-2:42). But the dancing with father and bride&groom moments near the stream was filmed with the 6D.

I used to own a Canon EOS 50D and I shot great photos with that as well as the first DSLR I had the Canon EOS 10D. It isn"t the camera that does the work getting great photos, but rather the photographer him/herself. Now that I own the Canon EOS 6D I am quite impressed by the improvement of the picture quality.

I agree, I started with a 40D, now use two 50D"s (mainly for sports) a 6D (mainly for portraiture & Event photography and an SR1 (my walk around camera) The 6D is really a great camera IMHO for the price

Stills are excellent with a 6D. Good sensor. I don"t care for the video capabilities (clumsy) or the video quality (artifacts). Another problem with the 6D is integration of features. For example you can shoot for high dynamic range, or RAW format, but not both. Every time I try some feature, other features are turned off without notice. When I called Canon about video moire" they played it dumb, as if my call was the first they"ve heard of it. Great way to instantly lose a customer!

Still now 6d has one of the best, if not best at all, sensor on market. See please text photos at dpreview. See clear and closer. See to colors at ISO 6400. Even Nikon Df has not same good sensor, he has just half stop less noises. And see to price please! Who want image quality, for then 6D is a pearl.

I own this camera and am very happy with it. Being a mostly still photographer I also do video but with a video camera. About the only thing I can complain about here is the lack of focal point for the Automatic Focus. Otherwise it is a great camera that takes great photos. The 6D is not a good sports camera. But for portraits and outdoor photography it is a decided winner in my book.

I have a rebel t2i and do LOTS of portrait and outdoor photography. I love my t2i but have been wanting to upgrade as I have had it since it came out. Does anyone have any recommendations or experience with the 6D vs the rebels?

I have the canon rebel XT (i think) and the 6D. There is a noticeable difference in performance and final image even whilst using the same lens. The 6D is deffinitly a solid camera at a good price.

I am very happy with the Canon EOS 6D camera. I purchased the kit with the 24-105 mm f4L IS USM lens. The quality and fit is exemplary of the 6D. It is more than a Pro-sumer camera. I will keep using this camera until I can replace it with the Canon 5D MkIV.

I have a 5Dmk2 and i want to change my camera for a Canon 6d. I want to ask you, if it worth for wedding photography. It is just for photos, movies are occasionally. I know it is better on ISO and focus on the center AF point on low light, and it is what i want.

I am going to tell you that I have shot weddings with a Canon 50D successfully. Is the 6D up to the task. I certainly think so. I recently upgraded to the Canon 6D and I can say it is quite worth the moderate expense to move forward with the Canon 6D. The only limitation would be the 11 point AF system. But hey, you need to ensure that everything you want is in focus in the first place. Good shooting!

You make some very good points Chrissy4605. As someone coming from 35mm film (via Rebel XT) I anticipate being quite satisfied with the 6D"s capabilities. Having taken quite satisfactory action sport shots on film with late 1960"s technology I am not daunted by the limitation of AF at the 6D"s price point. As for video, one expects some compromise from a camera primarily designed for still images.Thanks for your apposite comments!

I bought a Canon 6d because Im invested in Canon and have been since 1972 (although I also have Olympus Pen cameras) I didnt want to pay the cost of the 5d MKIII for amateur use but wanted full-frame the 6d was it.

Just rented the 5d MkIII, 6d and Sony A7r. The 6d had better low light performance, slightly sharper than the 5d MkIII and better controls and autofocusing than the A7r. I"ve also owned the Nikon D600. I"m so impressed with the 6D that I"m going to get one this week, it"s bang-for-the-buck rating hits the mark for me. Well, at least until the 5d MkIV.... ;)

Okay, someone explain. Don"t compare the 6D to its peers, compare it to a camera 2, 5, 10, 50 years ago when people were creating beautiful images. The ratings annoy me because they"re based on current technology and not historical technology. They"re not even based on picture quality. You"re nitpicking, pixel counting. Except for a lab analyst, your reviews are totally useless.

Moiré patterns are visual interference patterns that can occur in high resolution digital cameras. Anti-alias filters are designed to reduce or eliminate moiré patterns, but have been left out of some recent cameras in order to attain the highest possible resolution. I"m not sure whether or not the 6D has such a filter. Dpreview explains moiré patterns at this address...

I use my 6D primarily for video, but I record proper sound with an external recorder and only use the camera recorded sound as back up or for synching.

Additionally, the 6D uses exactly the same digi video processor as 5D3... so no I considered the 5D3 but couldn"t justify the addition $k for no functional value given how I planned to use it.

For my needs, the 6D really fell into a nice little niche. I don"t shoot video, so the headphone jack was a non issue. I don"t shoot sports, so the AF system wasn"t a big deal.

As someone who has shot numerous videos with DSLR"s (5D mk2, Mk3) and a canon c100 i personally dont think the headphone jack is that big of a loss. Most of the time anyone really serious about audio for a production will use external recorders and HD processing for audio as the DSLR compresses audio a bit. There have been a handful of times I use the internal audio for the final edit, even with external wireless or boom mics. I prefer separate source, slate it and combine in post. But that"s my personal preference after 12 years in the biz.

An interesting question to ask is why didn"t Canon detect video artifacts in design and testing? The moire is pretty bad and there is loud criticism from 6D owners, who see it immediately.

It has been suggested Canon hobbled the 6D deliberately for marketing reasons, to steer artists towards the more expensive 5DMIII. My solution was to buy a Sony A7II which provides excellent video!

This rating of the 6D is weird to say the least. Almost every reviewer out there rated video capabilities of 6D as definitely better then Nikon d610. How on earth here it gets much lower video rating then d610?? Yet focusing is rated relatively high? What"s going on? What am I missing?

I bought this camera 7 months ago and I absolutely love it for what I use it for. I live to shoot Lightning, astrophotography, long exposure etc. and the 6D shines beautifully due to its amazing low noise sensor up to ISO6400. The standard kit lens 24mm-105mm f4 L series is amazing. So sharp and accurate.

Where it lets me down is in the studio. In the field I manual focus everything, in the studio however I prefer to use autofocus at times. The autofocus on this camera sucks. Yes it can focus on the light of a full moon, but for everyday use it’s about 3 years behind the market. My guess is that the 6D came out after the 5dIII and Canon had to make sure that people still bought the 5dIII even though the 6D sensor is better in low light hands down. The 5DIII focus system is great!

Am I living on a different planet? I have a 5d2, T3i/600d, and now a 6d. With just the 5d2, I got familiar enough with the user interface to work in the dark.

I get it that the UI has to change with fewer thumb wheels on the 600d, and missing the joy-stick on the 6d However, the on/off changes, Mode, etc. seem like poor choices.

I have a very similar experience. Love my 6D and the Canon L lenses. Really enjoy how the Canon cameras capture the colors of nature. I was always fiddling with the greens on my Nikon images from both the D600 and D90 it replaced.

Finally ready to make the jump to full frame after 8 years with Olympus DSLR"s. After considerable research and gnashing of teeth I pulled the trigger on the 6D. I really wanted to go with the Nikon D 600 based on DP Review and various other reviews, based on features, output quality and MP, but the ongoing concerns over the sensor dust and oil spots and Nikons recalcitrant PR approach to these issues pushed me to the 6D. I just could not imagine investing $3k in full kit only to experience ongoing sensor issues. I am excited to experience the full frame format and take my amatuer photography to the next level.

Fully agree with your comments! I was about to go to Nikon D600 but was so much disappointed with their no-customer (snob) oriented approach that eventually decided for the 6D. I couldn"t be more satisfied for such a decision. I liked Nikon so much in the past (before digital era) they made so beautiful film cameras, but this is the past...the present looks different.

As for the software: I always shoot RAW and develop with Capture One and that"s excellent for other cameras, particularly for Fuji X raw files, but for 6D RAW files I found out that Canon software (Digital Photo Professional) gives better results. The only drawback of DPP is that it is very slow.

After a long deliberation, I decided to upgrade from my 5Dii to the 6D. Some may call it a sidegrade or even a downgrade, but for me, image quality is everything, and the ablity to focus and shoot in low light is paramount. I"m very happy with my decision, and so far I don"t miss any of the 5D line features. I"m getting shots I wouldn"t have gotten with the 5Dii (maybe not even with the mark iii), and most importantly I can afford to upgrade every one or two years with the current price point of the 6D rather than three or four with the 5D. I"d rather have more frequent updates of sensor technology instead of being left with a better built, feature packed but obsolete camera for the same money.

The difference is more obvious when you look at the brown fibers right on top of the color chart with the lady"s face. Also the black and white squares in the corners are a lot sharper with the Canon, but perhaps the used Canon lens performs better resolving detail in the corners than the Nikkor used with the D600 what might explain the difference in detail.

I don"t understand DP Review. Compare the Canon 6d and Nikon D600 and they"ll have you believe that the D600 edges ahead in the high ISO dept, but to my eyes the 6d wins when I use the comparative tool. Images appear slightly cleaner and sharper (in RAW). Move the box to the face of the lady and see for yourself

Some of that may be because the comparison may be on a pixel vs pixel basis. A single Canon pixel may have lower noise than a single Nikon pixel, but there are many more Nikon pixels.

I am mostly ignorant about video and the 70d, so "consider the source". My impression is that the Canon 70d is the only Canon camera with decent auto-focus.

"The EOS 6D is Canon"s attempt to entice DSLR owners who are looking for the benefits of full frame shooting - including shallower depth of field and wider-angle lens coverage, but can"t afford the EOS 5D Mark III."

The 6D would never be considered a great camera compared to the 5DMk3. More than likely the compromises that make the 6D "merely a very good one" are those with respect to the D600.

I switched to a Sony A7II and get a sumptuous 24MP image with any lens under the sun, including Canon FD series lenses. It"s a small, light rig with attractive retro styling. I"m happy.

Assuming we are looking into the camera"s OVF horizontally, the vertical coverage of the 6D"s sensor array is about 1/3 the height of the OVF, spreading from the centre AF point. The diamond shaped array is slightly wider, almost covering 2/3 the width of the EVF, but just almost. Shooting vertical portraits with extreme DOFs (like using the 50mm F1.2 L wide open) can be tricky, because the furthest points of the diamond AF array misses the subject"s eyes (under normal compositions) a little too much. But to be fair, the 5D Mark III"s high density AF array is not that much spread out either, especially when compared to Canon"s APS-C EOS bodies.

The limited warranty set forth below is given by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Canon U.S.A.) in the United States or Canon Canada Inc., (Canon Canada) in Canada with respect to the Canon brand EOS Digital Camera (the “Product”) *, when purchased and used in the United States or Canada. The Product purchased with this limited warranty is the only EOS Digital Camera to which this limited warranty applies.

Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Canada Inc. (collectively "Canon") warrant to the original end-user purchaser, when delivered in new condition in its original container, that the Product will be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one (1) year from the date of original purchase. Product returned to a Canon repair facility and proven to be defective upon inspection will, at Canon’s sole discretion and without charge, be (a) repaired utilizing new, remanufactured, repaired and/or recycled parts; (b) exchanged for a new Product or; (c) exchanged for a refurbished Product, as determined by the Canon repair facility. Warranty exchange or replacement does not extend the original warranty period of the Product.

THIS WARRANTY DOES NOT COVER ANY ACCESSORIES. This limited warranty shall only apply if the Product is used in conjunction with compatible computer equipment and compatible software, as to which items Canon U.S.A. or Canon Canada, shall have no responsibility. Non-Canon brand equipment and software that may be distributed with the Product are sold "as is" and without warranty of any kind by Canon U.S.A. or Canon Canada, including any implied warranty regarding merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, and all such warranties are disclaimed. The sole warranty, if any, with the respect to such non-Canon brand items is given by the manufacturer or producer thereof.

Loss of or damage to the Product due to abuse, mishandling, improper packaging by you, alteration, accident, electrical current fluctuations, failure to follow operating, maintenance or environmental instructions prescribed in Canon U.S.A."s or Canon Canada"s user"s manual or services performed by someone other than Canon U.S.A. or Canon Canada, or a Canon authorized service provider for the Product. Without limiting the foregoing, water damage, sand/corrosion damage, battery leakage, dropping the Product, scratches, abrasions or damage to the body, lenses or LCD display or damage to the any of the accessories mentioned in the first paragraph above will be presumed to have resulted from misuse, abuse or failure to operate the Product as set forth in the operating instructions

Use of parts or supplies (other than those sold by Canon U.S.A. or Canon Canada) that cause damage to the Product or cause abnormally frequent service calls or service problems

NO IMPLIED WARRANTY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, APPLIES TO THE PRODUCT AFTER THE APPLICABLE PERIOD OF THE EXPRESS LIMITED WARRANTY STATED ABOVE, AND NO OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTY OR GUARANTY, EXCEPT AS MENTIONED ABOVE, GIVEN BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCT SHALL BIND CANON U.S.A. OR CANON CANADA (SOME STATES AND PROVINCES DO NOT ALLOW LIMITATIONS ON HOW LONG AN IMPLIED WARRANTY LASTS, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU)..NEITHER CANON U.S.A. NOR CANON CANADA SHALL BE LIABLE FOR LOSS OF REVENUES OR PROFITS, INCONVENIENCE, EXPENSE FOR SUBSTITUTE EQUIPMENT OR SERVICE, STORAGE CHARGES, LOSS OR CORRUPTION OF DATA, OR ANY OTHER SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE USE OR MISUSE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE EOS DIGITAL CAMERA, REGARDLESS OF THE LEGAL THEORY ON WHICH THE CLAIM IS BASED, AND EVEN IF CANON U.S.A. OR CANON CANADA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL RECOVERY OF ANY KIND AGAINST CANON USA OR CANON CANADA BE GREATER IN AMOUNT THAN THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE PRODUCT SOLD BY CANON USA OR CANON CANADA AND CAUSING THE ALLEGED DAMAGE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, YOU ASSUME ALL RISK AND LIABILITY FOR LOSS, DAMAGE OR INJURY TO YOU AND YOUR PROPERTY AND TO OTHERS AND THEIR PROPERTY ARISING OUT OF USE OR MISUSE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE PRODUCT NOT CAUSED DIRECTLY BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF CANON USA OR CANON CANADA (SOME STATES AND PROVINCES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU). THIS LIMITED WARRANTY SHALL NOT EXTEND TO ANYONE OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE PRODUCT, OR THE PERSON FOR WHOM IT WAS PURCHASED AS A GIFT, AND STATES YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY.

When you call, have your Product serial number and your date of purchase available to expedite service. A Canon Customer Care representative will attempt to diagnose the nature of the problem and correct it over the telephone. If the problem cannot be corrected over the telephone, you will be asked to follow the applicable procedures for MAIL-IN SERVICE. Note that a dated proof of purchase is required at the time of service. This requirement will be satisfied by providing a copy of your dated bill of sale.

MAIL-IN SERVICE is a program under which your Product is repaired by a Canon U.S.A. or a Canon Canada authorized service center for the Product. Authorized service center information can be obtained by visiting www.canontechsupport.com (US customers only) or by contacting the Canon U.S.A., Customer Care Center or Canon Canada Customer Information Centre at 1-800-OK-CANON (1-800-652-2666). You will be given the name, address and phone number of an authorized service center.

The Canon EOS 6D is a full-frame 20.2MP DSLR offering exceptionally high image quality and detail while providing compatibility and convenience through its design and features. When paired with the powerful DIGIC 5+ image processor and 14-bit A/D conversion, the full-frame sensor is capable of recording vivid imagery with expanded sensitivity up to ISO 102400. The processing power also affords intelligent noise reduction techniques and the ability to record continuous still images at a rate up to 4.5 full resolution fps.

The 6D employs an 11-point autofocus system for acquiring precise focus regardless of the shooting situation, which is further enhanced by a center cross-type focus point for improved low-light focus sensitivity. The iFCL 63-zone dual layer metering sensor also benefits from the autofocus system when making exposure measurements, and analyzes color and luminance values within the scene to determine accurate exposure settings.

Built-in Wi-Fi and GPS technologies also provide extensive connectivity to the 6D. The built-in Wi-Fi capability allows you to take remote control over the 6D when used in conjunction with the Canon EOS Remote app (available for iOS and Android), as well as instantly share the images from your camera to your phone or to the CANON iMAGE GATEWAY. The GPS receiver will automatically record locational data and embed this information into the metadata of your images, allowing you to geotag your shots and map out where each shot was taken.

The 6D features a smaller form factor compared to other full-frame DSLRs, but still integrates a large 3.0" 1,040K-dot TFT LCD monitor for clear playback and review of your imagery. The construction of the body integrates an aluminum alloy and polycarbonate chassis within a magnesium and polycarbonate shell for durability while still maintaining a lightweight profile.